who am i? i am that which thou hast searched for since thy baby eyes gazed wonderingly upon the world, whose horizon hides this real life from thee. i am that which in thy heart thou hast prayed for, demanded as thy birthright, although thou hast not known what it was. i am that which has lain in thy soul for hundreds and thousands of years. sometimes i lay in thee grieving because thou didst not recognize me; sometimes i raised my head, opened my eyes, and extended my arms calling thee either tenderly and quietly, or strenuously, demanding that thou shouldst rebel against the iron chains which bound thee to the earth.
krishna.
so matters went on, and still go on, in the christian world. but we might have hope that in the immense brahman, buddhist, and confucian worlds this new scientific superstition would not establish itself, and that the chinese, japanese, and hindus, once their eyes were opened to the religious fraud justifying violence, would advance directly to a recognition of the law of love inherent in humanity, and which had been so forcibly enunciated by the great eastern teachers. but what has happened is that the scientific superstition replacing the religious one has been accepted and secured a stronger and stronger hold in the east.
in your periodical you set out as the basic principle which should guide the actions of your people the maxim that: 'resistance to aggression is not simply justifiable but imperative, nonresistance hurts both altruism and egotism.'
love is the only way to rescue humanity from all ills, and in it you too have the only method of saving your people from enslavement. in very ancient times love was proclaimed with special strength and clearness among your people to be the religious basis of human life. love, and forcible resistance to evil-doers, involve such a mutual contradiction as to destroy utterly the whole sense and meaning of the conception of love. and what follows? with a light heart and in the twentieth century you, an adherent of a religious people, deny their law, feeling convinced of your scientific enlightenment and your right to do so, and you repeat (do not take this amiss) the amazing stupidity indoctrinated in you by the advocates of the use of violence—the enemies of truth, the servants first of theology and then of science—your european teachers.
you say that the english have enslaved your people and hold them in subjection because the latter have not resisted resolutely enough and have not met force by force.
but the case is just the opposite. if the english have enslaved the people of india it is just because the latter recognized, and still recognize, force as the fundamental principle of the social order. in accord with that principle they submitted to their little rajahs, and on their behalf struggled against one another, fought the europeans, the english, and are now trying to fight with them again.
a commercial company enslaved a nation comprising two hundred millions. tell this to a man free from superstition and he will fail to grasp what these words mean. what does it mean that thirty thousand men, not athletes but rather weak and ordinary people, have subdued two hundred million vigorous, clever, capable, and freedom-loving people? do not the figures make it clear that it is not the english who have enslaved the indians, but the indians who have enslaved themselves?
when the indians complain that the english have enslaved them it is as if drunkards complained that the spirit-dealers who have settled among them have enslaved them. you tell them that they might give up drinking, but they reply that they are so accustomed to it that they cannot abstain, and that they must have alcohol to keep up their energy. is it not the same thing with the millions of people who submit to thousands' or even to hundreds, of others—of their own or other nations?
if the people of india are enslaved by violence it is only because they themselves live and have lived by violence, and do not recognize the eternal law of love inherent in humanity.
pitiful and foolish is the man who seeks what he already has, and does not know that he has it. yes, pitiful and foolish is he who does not know the bliss of love which surrounds him and which i have given him. krishna.
as soon as men live entirely in accord with the law of love natural to their hearts and now revealed to them, which excludes all resistance by violence, and therefore hold aloof from all participation in violence—as soon as this happens, not only will hundreds be unable to enslave millions, but not even millions will be able to enslave a single individual. do not resist the evil-doer and take no part in doing so, either in the violent deeds of the administration, in the law courts, the collection of taxes, or above all in soldiering, and no one in the world will be able to enslave you.
