the great variability of brick-earths deposited in river valleys is reflected to some extent in those laid down in lakes, though the size of the latter is frequently a controlling factor. the chief difference consists in the broader expanse of the sediment laid down—especially in large lakes—and variation in structure is not so noticeable horizontally. let us consider a simple case in which a lake is fed by a large river bringing down abundant sediment. the lake acts as a species of settling tank, and the method of deposition of the sediment by the river is mainly guided by the velocity of the stream. the tendency under normal conditions is for the river to commence parting with its sediment immediately on entering the lake. the detritus alluded to is only held in suspension by the velocity of the water; when the latter is checked, as on entering the lake, the grosser pieces subside, and as its rapidity becomes progressively curbed, medium-sized fragments are compelled to give way, until at last only very minute particles are left in the water. in due time most of these also are deposited. thus gravel is laid down before grit, grit before sand, and sand before clay.
if the velocity of the river always remained the same, we should be presented with thick accumulations of the same character in sharply defined areas. but it is always changing. with every storm and every steady18 rain the motion of the river becomes greatly accelerated, with the result that the deposits for the time being are deposited farther out in the lake than in more quiescent periods. in this way we may have a gravel thrown down on sand, sand on clay, and so on.
from the foregoing observations it will be gleaned that, in general, deposits in large lakes are more persistent in character than are river deposits; indeed, in very large sheets of water, as lake superior, lake erie, &c., they are in this sense more comparable with sediment of marine origin.
the practical value of this knowledge hinges on the correct determination of the origin of the deposits, and it is not always easy to identify a brick-earth of lacustrine origin. in all probability the tyro, on meeting one, would be disposed to regard it as a river deposit pure and simple. the valuation of a brick-earth property under such circumstances would thus be greatly in favour of the prospective purchaser; but it would be disastrous for the seller. a random section, except in the case of a very large lake, would show gravels, sands and clays in much the same manner as the river deposits described in the last article of this series. but, as previously remarked, on the whole they would be more continuous and persistent, and what is quite as important, the mineral composition of each stratum would be equally homogeneous when traced over wide areas. the geologist distinguishes a lacustrine deposit from one of fluviatile origin more from its mineral constitution and the general disposition of the beds, as ascertained by mapping, than from evidence afforded by fossils—these latter for the most part being similar to those found in the deposits left by rivers.
the well-known brick-earth called “reading mottled19 clay,” so extensively developed on the outskirts of the london basin, and in the isle of wight and hampshire generally, furnishes a good example of a lacustrine deposit. many millions of bricks are made from this bed every year, and in some parts of the districts mentioned the stratum is thick and extensively developed. it is pure enough to be suitable for terra-cotta manufacture here and there. no one who had seen this remarkable deposit could possibly fail to recognise it again. the natural colour of the clay when damp is brilliant red, scarlet or crimson, in large blotches and patches mottled tea-green and yellow, and locally white.
we have been intensely amused to note the efforts in recent years to obtain possession of a few acres of this coveted deposit for brickmaking in divers localities. not long since we visited a large brickmaking establishment where these reading plastic clays are actively raised and used, the works being situated four miles from the nearest railway. there were no other brickworks between it and the railway line, and there was no water accommodation. enquiry revealed the fact that the greater part of the intervening land belonged to the same landowner as the ground where the brickyard stands, and that no difficulty was apprehended of the owner letting out such intervening land for the same uses and on the same terms if other brickyards were contemplated. the proprietor of the brickyard in question volunteered the information that the reason he started so far from the railway was because the earth at the point selected was the only kind suitable for brickmaking in the neighbourhood. we then questioned him as to his knowledge of the brick-earths in the district, and eventually elicited the fact that he chanced upon the spot selected, without any reasoning therefor,20 and commenced operations. as a matter of fact, precisely the same clay extended from his works all the way to the railway line, and had he known anything whatever of the geology of the district (even the merest boy’s knowledge of the subject), he would have seen how to save that four miles of road carriage. what prevented him from knowing the fact was a thin mantle of gravel and soil about four feet in thickness, which covered the plastic clay in the area generally, except in the immediate vicinity of his brickyard. that was in reference to a lacustrine deposit—the reading plastic clay—and shows the value of knowing something of its persistent character; if it had been a river deposit there would not have been so much room for wonderment.
to give some idea of the extent of that particular horizon, we may say that not only is the plastic clay alluded to found so extensively in the london and hampshire basins, it is even more expanded in the north-eastern parts of france, and is there as much utilised as on this side of the channel for brickmaking.
lacustrine deposits are sometimes of enormous value to the clayworker, on account of the general purity of the clays. this is more particularly the case when the material deposited is in part or wholly derived from chemical disintegration of granitic rocks, as in the celebrated bovey heathfield clays near newton abbot, so well described in a small pamphlet by mr. s. smith harvey. here an experimental boring proved the clays to a depth of 130 feet with no signs of exhaustion. in the divers clay-pits but a small proportion of waste is found, the different levels vary in composition, and, like almost all thick clays, improve in quality as the depth increases. the strata are very irregular towards the surface, due perhaps to the action of local21 freshets in the final periods of the history of the lake. these clays are extensively employed for the manufacture of stoneware pipes, facing and other bricks, fire-bricks, etc. they constitute a somewhat remarkable exception to the class of clays laid down in lakes, as a rule, and, as will have been observed, are of enormous thickness.
we have very little to say in regard to estuarine brick-earths; as might readily be anticipated, they are intermediate in character between fluviatile and marine deposits, and approach the one or the other according to position in the estuary. on the whole, they are variable in character, individual beds being thin. the strata frequently contain abundant plant remains (pieces of wood, etc.), and, except in the case of large rivers, are not noted for yielding very good brick-earths. sometimes, however, the quality of the clays is not bad, as instance the bricks made in lincolnshire and northamptonshire from jurassic estuarine clays.
