subjugation of the cossaeans.—embassies from distant nations.

the mourning was prolonged for many days; and as he was now beginning to recall himself from it, under such circumstances his companions had less difficulty in rousing him to action. then at length he made an expedition against the cossaeans,910 a warlike race bordering on the territory of the uxians. they are mountaineers, inhabiting strong positions in separate villages. whenever a force approached them, they were in the habit of retiring to the summits of their mountains, either in a body or separately as each man found it practicable; and thus they escaped, making it difficult for those who attacked them with their forces to come near them. after the enemy’s departure, they used to turn themselves again to marauding, by which occupation they supported themselves. but alexander subdued this race, though he marched against them in the winter; for neither winter nor ruggedness of ground 399was any impediment either to him or to ptolemy, son of lagus, who led a part of the army in the campaign against them. thus no military enterprise which alexander undertook was ever unsuccessful. as he was marching back to babylon, he was met by embassies from the libyans, who congratulated him and crowned him as conqueror of the kingdom of asia.911 from italy also came bruttians, lucanians, and tyrrhenians912 as envoys, for the same purpose. the carthaginians are said to have sent an embassy to him at this time913; and it is also asserted that envoys came to request his friendship from the ethiopians, the scythians of europe, the gauls, and iberians—nations whose names were heard and their accoutrements seen then for the first time by greeks and macedonians. they are also said to have entrusted to alexander the duty of settling their disputes with each other. then indeed it was especially evident both to himself and to those about him that he was lord of all the land and sea.914 of the men who have written the history of alexander, aristus and asclepiades915 alone say that the romans also sent an embassy to him, and that when he met their embassy, he predicted something of the future power of rome, observing both the attire of the men, their love of labour, and their devotion to freedom. at the same time he made urgent inquiries about their political constitution. this incident i have recorded neither as certainly authentic nor as altogether incredible; but none of the roman writers have made 400any mention of this embassy having been despatched to alexander; nor of those who have written an account of alexander’s actions, has either ptolemy, son of lagus, or aristobulus mentioned it. with these authors i am generally inclined to agree. nor does it seem likely that the roman republic, which was at that time remarkable for its love of liberty, would send an embassy to a foreign king, especially to a place so far away from their own land, when they were not compelled to do so by fear or any hope of advantage, being possessed as they were beyond any other people by hatred to the very name and race of despots.