origin of the anglo-americans and its importance, in relation to their future condition.

utility of knowing the origin of nations in order to understand their social condition and their laws.—america the only country in which the starting-point of a great people has been clearly observable.—in what respects all who emigrated to british america were similar.—in what they differed.—remark applicable to all the europeans who established themselves on the shores of the new world.—colonization of virginia.—colonization of new england.—original character of the first inhabitants of new england.—their arrival.—their first laws.—their social contract.—penal code borrowed from the hebrew legislation.—religious fervor.—republican spirit.—intimate union of the spirit of religion with the spirit of liberty.

after the birth of a human being, his early years are obscurely spent in the toils or pleasures of childhood. as he grows up, the world receives him, when his manhood begins, and he enters into contact with his fellows. he is then studied for the first time, and it is imagined that the germe of the vices and the virtues of his maturer years is then formed.

this, if i am not mistaken, is a great error. we must begin higher up; we must watch the infant in his mother's arms; we must see the first images which the external world casts upon the dark mirror of his mind; the first occurrences which he beholds; we must hear the first words which awaken the sleeping powers of thought, and stand by his earliest efforts, if we would understand the prejudices, the habits, and the passions, which will rule his life. the entire man is, so to speak, to be seen in the cradle of the child.

the growth of nations presents something analogous to this; they all bear some marks of their origin; and the circumstances which accompanied their birth and contributed to their rise, affect the whole term of their being.

if we were able to go back to the elements of states, and to examine the oldest monuments of their history, i doubt not that we should discover the primary cause of the prejudices, the habits, the ruling passions, and in short of all that constitutes what is called the national character: we should then find the explanation of certain customs which now seem at variance with prevailing manners, of such laws as conflict with established principles, and of such incoherent opinions as are here and there to be met with in society, like those fragments of broken chains which we sometimes see hanging from the vault of an edifice, and supporting nothing. this might explain the destinies of certain nations which seem borne along by an unknown force to ends of which they themselves are ignorant. but hitherto facts have been wanting to researches of this kind: the spirit of inquiry has only come upon communities in their latter days; and when they at length turned their attention to contemplate their origin, time had already obscured it, or ignorance and pride adorned it with truth-concealing fables.

america is the only country in which it has been possible to study the natural and tranquil growth of society, and where the influence exercised on the future condition of states by their origin is clearly distinguishable.

at the period when the people of europe landed in the new world, their national characteristics were already completely formed; each of them had a physiognomy of its own; and as they had already attained that stage of civilisation at which men are led to study themselves, they have transmitted to us a faithful picture of their opinions, their manners, and their laws. the men of the sixteenth century are almost as well known to us as our contemporaries. america consequently exhibits in the broad light of day the phenomena which the ignorance or rudeness of earlier ages conceals from our researches. near enough to the time when the states of america were founded to be accurately acquainted with their elements, and sufficiently removed from that period to judge of some of their results. the men of our own day seem destined to see farther than their predecessors into the series of human events. providence has given us a torch which our forefathers did not possess, and has allowed us to discern fundamental causes in the history of the world which the obscurity of the past concealed from them.

if we carefully examine the social and political state of america, after having studied its history, we shall remain perfectly convinced that not an opinion, not a custom, not a law, i may even say not an event, is upon record which the origin of that people will not explain. the readers of this book will find the germe of all that is to follow in the present chapter, and the key to almost the whole work.

the emigrants who came at different periods to occupy the territory now covered by the american union, differed from each other in many respects; their aim was not the same, and they governed themselves on different principles.

these men had, however, certain features in common, and they were all placed in an analogous situation. the tie of language is perhaps the strongest and most durable that can unite mankind. all the emigrants spoke the same tongue; they were all offsets from the same people. born in a country which had been agitated for centuries by the struggles of faction, and in which all parties had been obliged in their turn to place themselves under the protection of the laws, their political education had been perfected in this rude school, and they were more conversant with the notions of right, and the principles of true freedom, than the greater part of their european contemporaries. at the period of the first emigrations, the parish system, that fruitful germe of free institutions, was deeply rooted in the habits of the english; and with it the doctrine of the sovereignty of the people had been introduced even into the bosom of the monarchy of the house of tudor.

the religious quarrels which have agitated the christian world were then rife. england had plunged into the new order of things with headlong vehemence. the character of its inhabitants, which had always been sedate and reflecting, became argumentative and austere. general information had been increased by intellectual debate, and the mind had received a deeper cultivation. while religion was the topic of discussion, the morals of the people were reformed. all these national features are more or less discoverable in the physiognomy of those adventurers who came to seek a new home on the opposite shores of the atlantic.

another remark, to which we shall hereafter have occasion to recur, is applicable not only to the english, but to the french, the spaniards, and all the europeans who successively established themselves in the new world. all these european colonies contained the elements, if not the development of a complete democracy. two causes led to this result. it may safely be advanced, that on leaving the mother-country the emigrants had in general no notion of superiority over one another. the happy and the powerful do not go into exile, and there are no surer guarantees of equality among men than poverty and misfortune. it happened, however, on several occasions that persons of rank were driven to america by political and religious quarrels. laws were made to establish a gradation of ranks; but it was soon found that the soil of america was entirely opposed to a territorial aristocracy. to bring that refractory land into cultivation, the constant and interested exertions of the owner himself were necessary; and when the ground was prepared, its produce was found to be insufficient to enrich a master and a farmer at the same time. the land was then naturally broken up into small portions, which the proprietor cultivated for himself. land is the basis of an aristocracy, which clings to the soil that supports it; for it is not by privileges alone, nor by birth, but by landed property handed down from generation to generation, that an aristocracy is constituted. a nation may present immense fortunes and extreme wretchedness; but unless those fortunes are territorial, there is no aristocracy, but simply the class of the rich and that of the poor.

all the british colonies had then a great degree of similarity at the epoch of their settlement. all of them, from their first beginning, seemed destined to behold the growth, not of the aristocratic liberty of their mother-country, but of that freedom of the middle and lower orders of which the history of the world has as yet furnished no complete example.

in this general uniformity several striking differences were however discernible, which it is necessary to point out. two branches may be distinguished in the anglo-american family, which have hitherto grown up without entirely commingling; the one in the south, the other in the north.

virginia received the first english colony; the emigrants took possession of it in 1607. the idea that mines of gold and silver are the sources of national wealth, was at that time singularly prevalent in europe; a fatal delusion, which has done more to impoverish the nations which adopted it, and has cost more lives in america, than the united influence of war and bad laws. the men sent to virginia{14} were seekers of gold, adventurers without resources and without character, whose turbulent and restless spirits endangered the infant colony,{15} and rendered its progress uncertain. the artisans and agriculturists arrived afterward; and although they were a more moral and orderly race of men, they were in nowise above the level of the inferior classes in england.{16} no lofty conceptions, no intellectual system directed the foundation of these new settlements. the colony was scarcely established when slavery was introduced,{17} and this was the main circumstance which has exercised so prodigious an influence on the character, the laws, and all the future prospects of the south.

slavery, as we shall afterward show, dishonors labor; it introduces idleness into society, and, with idleness, ignorance and pride, luxury and distress. it enervates the powers of the mind, and benumbs the activity of man. the influence of slavery, united to the english character, explains the mariners and the social condition of the southern states.

in the north, the same english foundation was modified by the most opposite shades of character; and here i may be allowed to enter into some details. the two or three main ideas which constitute the basis of the social theory of the united states, were first combined in the northern british colonies, more generally denominated the states of new england.{18} the principles of new england spread at first to the neighboring states; they then passed successively to the more distant ones; and at length they embued the whole confederation. they now extend their influence beyond its limits over the whole american world. the civilisation of new england has been like a beacon lit upon a hill, which, after it has diffused its warmth around, tinges the distant horizon with its glow.

the foundation of new england was a novel spectacle, and all the circumstances attending it were singular and original. the large majority of colonies have been first inhabited either by men without education and without resources, driven by their poverty and their misconduct from the land which gave them birth, or by speculators and adventurers greedy of gain. some settlements cannot even boast so honorable an origin: st. domingo was founded by buccaneers; and, at the present day, the criminal courts of england supply the population of australia.

the settlers who established themselves on the shores of new england all belonged to the more independent classes of their native country. their union on the soil of america at once presented the singular phenomenon of a society containing neither lords nor common people, neither rich nor poor. these men possessed, in proportion to their number, a greater mass of intelligence than is to be found in any european nation of our own time. all, without a single exception, had received a good education, and many of them were known in europe for their talents and their acquirements. the other colonies had been founded by adventurers without family; the emigrants of new england brought with them the best elements of order and morality, they landed in the desert accompanied by their wives and children. but what most especially distinguished them was the aim of their undertaking. they had not been obliged by necessity to leave their country, the social position they abandoned was one to be regretted, and their means of subsistence were certain. nor did they cross the atlantic to improve their situation, or to increase their wealth; the call which summoned them from the comforts of their homes was purely intellectual; and in facing the inevitable sufferings of exile, their object was the triumph of an idea.

the emigrants, or, as they deservedly styled themselves, the pilgrims, belonged to that english sect, the austerity of whose principles had acquired for them the name of puritans. puritanism was not merely a religious doctrine, but it corresponded in many points with the most absolute democratic and republican theories. it was this tendency which had aroused its most dangerous adversaries. persecuted by the government of the mother-country, and disgusted by the habits of a society opposed to the rigor of their own principles, the puritans went forth to seek some rude and unfrequented part of the world, where they could live according to their own opinions, and worship god in freedom.

a few quotations will throw more light upon the spirit of these pious adventurers than all we can say of them. nathaniel morton,{19} the historian of the first years of the settlement, thus opens his subject:—

"gentle reader: i have for some length of time looked upon it as a duty incumbent, especially on the immediate successors of those that have had so large experience of those many memorable and signal demonstrations of god's goodness, viz., the first beginning of this plantation in new england, to commit to writing his gracious dispensations on that behalf; having so many inducements thereunto, not only otherwise, but so plentifully in the sacred scriptures: that so, what we have seen, and what our fathers have told us (psalm lxxviii., 3, 4), we may not hide from our children, showing to the generations to come the praises of the lord; that especially the seed of abraham his servant, and the children of jacob his chosen (psalm cv., 5, 6), may remember his marvellous works in the beginning and progress of the planting of new england, his wonders and the judgments of his mouth; how that god brought a vine into this wilderness; that he cast out the heathen and planted it; that he made room for it, and caused it to take deep root; and it filled the land (psalm lxxx., 8, 9). and not onely so, but also that he hath guided his people by his strength to his holy habitation, and planted them in the mountain of his inheritance in respect of precious gospel enjoyments: and that as especially god may have the glory of all unto whom it is most due; so also some rays of glory may reach the names of those blessed saints, that were the main instruments and the beginning of this happy enterprise."

it is impossible to read this opening paragraph without an involuntary feeling of religious awe; it breathes the very savor of gospel antiquity. the sincerity of the author heightens his power of language. the band, which to his eyes was a mere party of adventurers, gone forth to seek their fortune beyond the seas, appears to the reader as the germe of a great nation wafted by providence to a predestined shore.

the author thus continues his narrative of the departure of the first pilgrims:—

"so they left that goodly and pleasant city of leyden, which had been their resting-place for above eleven years; but they knew that they were pilgrims and strangers here below, and looked not much on these things, but lifted up their eyes to heaven, their dearest country, where god hath prepared for them a city (heb. xi., 16), and therein quieted their spirits. when they came to delfs-haven they found the ship and all things ready; and such of their friends as could come with them, followed after them, and sundry came from amsterdam to see them shipt, and to take their leaves of them. one night was spent with little sleep with the most, but with friendly entertainment and christian discourse, and other real expressions of true christian love. the next day they went on board, and their friends with them, where truly doleful was the sight of that sad and mournful parting, to hear what sighs and sobs and prayers did sound among them; what tears did gush from every eye, and pithy speeches pierced each other's heart, that sundry of the dutch strangers that stood on the key as spectators could not refrain from tears. but the tide (which stays for no man) calling them away that were thus loath to depart, their reverend pastor falling down on his knees, and they all with him, with watery cheeks commended them with most fervent prayers unto the lord and his blessing; and then, with mutual embraces and many tears, they took their leaves one of another, which proved to be the last leave to many of them."

the emigrants were about 150 in number, including the women and the children. their object was to plant a colony on the shores of the hudson; but after having been driven about for some time in the atlantic ocean, they were forced to land on that arid coast of new england which is now the site of the town of plymouth. the rock is still shown on which the pilgrims disembarked.{20}

"but before we pass on," continues our historian, "let the reader with me make a pause, and seriously consider this poor people's present condition, the more to be raised up to admiration of god's goodness toward them in their preservation: for being now passed the vast ocean, and a sea of troubles before them in expectation, they had now no friends to welcome them, no inns to entertain or refresh them, no houses, or much less towns to repair unto to seek for succor; and for the season it was winter, and they that know the winters of the country know them to be sharp and violent, subject to cruel and fierce storms, dangerous to travel to known places, much more to search unknown coasts. besides, what could they see but a hideous and desolate wilderness, full of wilde beasts, and wilde men? and what multitudes of them there were, they then knew not: for which way soever they turned their eyes (save upward to heaven) they could have but little solace or content in respect of any outward object; for summer being ended, all things stand in appearance with a weather-beaten face, and the whole country full of woods and thickets represented a wild and savage hue; if they looked behind them, there was the mighty ocean which they had passed, and was now as a main bar or gulph to separate them from all the civil parts of the world."

it must not be imagined that the piety of the puritans was of a merely speculative kind, or that it took no cognizance of the course of worldly affairs. puritanism, as i have already remarked, was scarcely less a political than a religious doctrine. no sooner had the emigrants landed on the barren coast, described by nathaniel morton, than their first care was to constitute a society, by passing the following act:{21}—

"in the name of god, amen! we, whose names are underwritten, the loyal subjects of our dread sovereign lord king james, &c., &c., having undertaken for the glory of god and advancement of the christian faith, and the honor of our king and country, a voyage to plant the first colony in the northern parts of virginia: do by these presents solemnly and mutually, in the presence of god and one another, covenant and combine ourselves together into a civil body politic, for our better ordering and preservation, and furtherance of the ends aforesaid: and by virtue hereof do enact, constitute, and frame, such just and equal laws, ordinances, acts, constitutions, and officers, from time to time, as shall be thought most meet and convenient for the general good of the colony: unto which we promise all due submission and obedience," &c.{22}

this happened in 1620, and from that time forward the emigration went on. the religious and political passions which ravished the british empire during the whole reign of charles i., drove fresh crowds of sectarians every year to the shores of america. in england the stronghold of puritanism was in the middle classes, and it was from the middle classes that the majority of the emigrants came. the population of new england increased rapidly; and while the hierarchy of rank despotically classed the inhabitants of the mother-country, the colony continued to present the novel spectacle of a community homogeneous in all its parts. a democracy, more perfect than any which antiquity had dreamed of, started in full size and panoply from the midst of an ancient feudal society.

the english government was not dissatisfied with an emigration which removed the elements of fresh discord and of future revolutions. on the contrary, everything was done to encourage it, and little attention was paid to the destiny of those who sought a shelter from the rigor of their country's laws on the soil of america. it seemed as if new england was a region given up to the dreams of fancy, and the unrestrained experiments of innovators.

the english colonies (and this is one of the main causes of their prosperity) have always enjoyed more internal freedom and more political independence than the colonies of other nations; but this principle of liberty was nowhere more extensively applied than in the states of new england.

it was generally allowed at that period that the territories of the new world belonged to that european nation which had been the first to discover them. nearly the whole coast of north america thus became a british possession toward the end of the sixteenth century. the means used by the english government to people these new domains were of several kinds: the king sometimes appointed a governor of his own choice, who ruled a portion of the new world in the name and under the immediate orders of the crown;{23} this is the colonial system adopted by the other countries of europe. sometimes grants of certain tracts were made by the crown to an individual or to a company,{24} in which case all the civil and political power fell into the hands of one or more persons, who, under the inspection and control of the crown, sold the lands and governed the inhabitants. lastly, a third system consisted in allowing a certain number of emigrants to constitute a political society under the protection of the mother-country, and to govern themselves in whatever was not contrary to her laws. this mode of colonization, so remarkably favorable to liberty, was adopted only in new england.{25}

in 1628,{26} a charter of this kind was granted by charles i. to the emigrants who went to form the colony of massachusetts. but, in general, charters were not given to the colonies of new england till they had acquired a certain existence. plymouth, providence, new haven, the state of connecticut, and that of rhode island,{27} were founded without the co-operation, and almost without the knowledge of the mother-country. the new settlers did not derive their incorporation from the head of the empire, although they did not deny its supremacy; they constituted a society of their own accord, and it was not till thirty or forty years afterward, under charles ii., that their existence was legally recognised by a royal charter.

this frequently renders it difficult to detect the link which connected the emigrants with the land of their forefathers, in studying the earliest historical and legislative records of new england. they perpetually exercised the rights of sovereignty; they named their magistrates, concluded peace or declared war, made police regulations, and enacted laws, as if their allegiance was due only to god.{28} nothing can be more curious, and at the same time more instructive than the legislation of that period; it is there that the solution of the great social problem which the united states now present to the world is to be found.

among these documents we shall notice as especially characteristic, the code of laws promulgated by the little state of connecticut in 1650.{29}

the legislators of connecticut{30} begin with the penal laws, and, strange to say, they borrow their provisions from the text of holy writ.

"whoever shall worship any other god than the lord," says the preamble of the code, "shall surely be put to death." this is followed by ten or twelve enactments of the same kind, copied verbatim from the books of exodus, leviticus, and deuteronomy. blasphemy, sorcery, adultery,{31} and rape were punished with death; an outrage offered by a son to his parents, was to be expiated by the same penalty. the legislation of a rude and half-civilized people was thus transferred to an enlightened and moral community. the consequence was, that the punishment of death was never more frequently prescribed by the statute, and never more rarely enforced toward the guilty.

the chief care of the legislators, in this body of penal laws, was the maintenance of orderly conduct and good morals in the community: they constantly invaded the domain of conscience, and there was scarcely a sin which they did not subject to magisterial censure. the reader is aware of the rigor with which these laws punished rape and adultery; intercourse between unmarried persons was likewise severely repressed. the judge was empowered to inflict a pecuniary penalty, a whipping, or marriage,{32} on the misdemeanants; and if the records of the old courts of new haven may be believed, prosecutions of this kind were not infrequent. we find a sentence bearing date the first of may, 1660, inflicting a fine and a reprimand on a young woman who was accused of using improper language, and of allowing herself to be kissed.{33} the code of 1650 abounds in preventive measures. it punishes idleness and drunkenness with severity.{34} innkeepers are forbidden to furnish more than a certain quantity of liquor to each customer; and simple lying, whenever it may be injurious,{35} is checked by a fine or a flogging. in other places, the legislator, entirely forgetting the great principles of religious toleration which he had himself upheld in europe, renders attendance on divine service compulsory,{36} and goes so far as to visit with severe punishment,{37} and even with death, the christians who chose to worship god according to a ritual differing from his own.{38} sometimes indeed, the zeal of his enactments induces him to descend to the most frivolous particulars: thus a law is to be found in the same code which prohibits the use of tobacco.{39} it must not be forgotten that these fantastical and vexatious laws were not imposed by authority, but that they were freely voted by all the persons interested, and that the manners of the community were even more austere and more puritanical than the laws. in 1649 a solemn association was formed in boston to check the worldly luxury of long hair.{40}

these errors are no doubt discreditable to the human reason; they attest the inferiority of our nature, which is incapable of laying firm hold upon what is true and just, and is often reduced to the alternative of two excesses. in strict connection with this penal legislation, which bears such striking marks of a narrow sectarian spirit, and of those religious passions which had been warmed by persecution, and were still fermenting among the people, a body of political laws is to be found, which, though written two hundred years ago, is still ahead of the liberties of our age.

the general principles which are the groundwork of modern constitutions—principles which were imperfectly known in europe, and not completely triumphant even in great britain, in the seventeenth century—were all recognised and determined by the laws of new england: the intervention of the people in public affairs, the free voting of taxes, the responsibility of authorities, personal liberty, and trial by jury, were all positively established without discussion.

from these fruitful principles, consequences have been derived and applications have been made such as no nation in europe has yet ventured to attempt.

in connecticut the electoral body consisted, from its origin, of the whole number of citizens; and this is readily to be understood,{41} when we recollect that this people enjoyed an almost perfect equality of fortune, and a still greater uniformity of capacity.{42} in connecticut, at this period, all the executive functionaries were elected, including the governor of the state.{43} the citizens above the age of sixteen were obliged to bear arms; they formed a national militia, which appointed its own officers, and was to hold itself at all times in readiness to march for the defence of the country.{44}

in the laws of connecticut, as well as in those of new england, we find the germe and gradual development of that township independence, which is the life and mainspring of american liberty at the present day. the political existence of the majority of the nations of europe commenced in the superior ranks of society, and was gradually and always imperfectly communicated to the different members of the social body. in america, on the other hand, it may be said that the township was organized before the county, the county before the state, the state before the union.

in new england, townships were completely and definitively constituted as early as 1650. the independence of the township was the nucleus around which the local interests, passions, rights, and duties, collected and clung. it gave scope to the activity of a real political life, most thoroughly democratic and republican. the colonies still recognised the supremacy of the mother-country; monarchy was still the law of the state; but the republic was already established in every township.

the towns named their own magistrates of every kind, rated themselves, and levied their own taxes.{45} in the townships of new england the law of representation was not adopted, but the affairs of the community were discussed, as at athens, in the market-place, by a general assembly of the citizens.

in studying the laws which were promulgated at this first era of the american republics, it is impossible not to be struck by the remarkable acquaintance with the science of government, and the advanced theory of legislation, which they display. the ideas there formed of the duties of society toward its members, are evidently much loftier and more comprehensive than those of the european legislators at that time: obligations were there imposed which were elsewhere slighted. in the states of new england, from the first, the condition of the poor was provided for;{46} strict measures were taken for the maintenance of roads, and surveyors were appointed to attend to them;{47} registers were established in every parish, in which the results of public deliberations, and the births, deaths, and marriages of the citizens were entered;{48} clerks were directed to keep these registers;{49} officers were charged with the administration of vacant inheritances, and with the arbitration of litigated landmarks; and many others were created whose chief functions were the maintenance of public order in the community.{50} the law enters into a thousand useful provisions for a number of social wants which are at present very inadequately felt in france.

but it is by the attention it pays to public education that the original character of american civilisation is at once placed in the clearest light. "it being," says the law, "one chief project of satan to keep men from the knowledge of the scripture by persuading from the use of tongues, to the end that learning may not be buried in the graves of our forefathers, in church and commonwealth, the lord assisting our endeavors."{51} here follow clauses establishing schools in every township, and obliging the inhabitants, under pain of heavy fines, to support them. schools of a superior kind were founded in the same manner in the more populous districts. the municipal authorities were bound to enforce the sending of children to school by their parents; they were empowered to inflict fines upon all who refused compliance; and in cases of continued resistance, society assumed the place of the parent, took possession of the child, and deprived the father of those natural rights which he used to so bad a purpose. the reader will undoubtedly have remarked the preamble of these enactments: in america, religion is the road to knowledge, and the observance of the divine laws leads men to civil freedom.

if, after having cast a rapid glance over the state of american society in 1650, we turn to the condition of europe, and more especially to that of the continent, at the same period, we cannot fail to be struck with astonishment. on the continent of europe, at the beginning of the seventeenth century, absolute monarchy had everywhere triumphed over the ruins of the oligarchical and feudal liberties of the middle ages. never were the notions of right more completely confounded than in the midst of the splendor and literature of europe; never was there less political activity among the people; never were the principles of true freedom less widely circulated, and at that very time, those principles, which were scorned or unknown by the nations of europe, were proclaimed in the deserts of the new world, and were accepted as the future creed of a great people. the boldest theories of the human reason were put into practice by a community so humble, that not a statesman condescended to attend to it; and a legislation without precedent was produced off-hand by the imagination of the citizens. in the bosom of this obscure democracy, which had as yet brought forth neither generals, nor philosophers, nor authors, a man might stand up in the face of a free people, and pronounce amid general acclamations the following fine definition of liberty:{52}—

"nor would i have you to mistake in the point of your own liberty. there is a liberty of corrupt nature, which is affected both by men and beasts to do what they list; and this liberty is inconsistent with authority, impatient of all restraint; by this liberty 'sumus omnes deteriores;' it is the grand enemy of truth and peace, and all the ordinances of god are bent against it. but there is a civil, a moral, a federal liberty, which is the proper end and object of authority; it is a liberty for that only which is just and good: for this liberty you are to stand with the hazard of your very lives, and whatsoever crosses it is not authority, but a distemper thereof. this liberty is maintained in a way of subjection to authority; and the authority set over you will, in all administrations for your good, be quietly submitted unto by all but such as have a disposition to shake off the yoke and lose their true liberty, by their murmuring at the honor and power of authority."

the remarks i have made will suffice to display the character of anglo-american civilisation in its true light. it is the result (and this should be constantly present to the mind) of two distinct elements, which in other places have been in frequent hostility, but which in america have admirably incorporated and combined with one another. i allude to the spirit of religion and the spirit of liberty.

the settlers of new england were at the same time ardent sectarians and daring innovators. narrow as the limits of some of their religious opinions were, they were entirely free from political prejudices.

hence arose two tendencies, distinct but not opposite, which are constantly discernible in the manners as well as in the laws of the country.

it might be imagined that men who sacrificed their friends, their family, and their native land, to a religious conviction, were absorbed in the pursuit of the intellectual advantages which they purchased at so dear a rate. the energy, however, with which they strove for the acquirements of wealth, moral enjoyment, and the comforts as well as the liberties of the world, was scarcely inferior to that with which they devoted themselves to heaven.

political principles, and all human laws and institutions were moulded and altered at their pleasure; the barriers of the society in which they were born were broken down before them; the old principles which had governed the world for ages were no more; a path without a turn, and a field without a horizon, were opened to the exploring and ardent curiosity of man; but at the limits of the political world he checks his researches, he discreetly lays aside the use of his most formidable faculties, he no longer consents to doubt or to innovate, but carefully abstaining from raising the curtain of the sanctuary, he yields with submissive respect to truths which he will not discuss.

thus in the moral world, everything is classed, adapted, decided, and foreseen; in the political world everything is agitated, uncertain, and disputed: in the one is a passive, though a voluntary obedience; in the other an independence, scornful of experience and jealous of authority.

these two tendencies, apparently so discrepant, are far from conflicting; they advance together, and mutually support each other.

religion perceives that civil liberty affords a noble exercise to the faculties of man, and that the political world is a field prepared by the creator for the efforts of the intelligence. contented with the freedom and the power which it enjoys in its own sphere, and with the place which it occupies, the empire of religion is never more surely established than when it reigns in the hearts of men unsupported by aught besides its native strength.

religion is no less the companion of liberty in all its battles and its triumphs; the cradle of its infancy, and the divine source of its claims. the safeguard of morality is religion, and morality is the best security of law as well as the surest pledge of freedom.

reasons of certain anomalies which the laws and customs of the anglo-americans present.

remains of aristocratic institutions in the midst of a complete democracy.—why?—distinction carefully to be drawn between what is of puritanical and what is of english origin.

the reader is cautioned not to draw too general or too absolute an inference from what has been said. the social condition, the religion, and the manners of the first emigrants undoubtedly exercised an immense influence on the destiny of their new country. nevertheless it was not in their power to found a state of things originating solely in themselves; no man can entirely shake off the influence of the past, and the settlers, unintentionally or involuntarily, mingled habits derived from their education and from the traditions of their country, with those habits and notions which were exclusively their own. to form a judgment on the anglo-americans of the present day, it is therefore necessary carefully to distinguish what is of puritanical from what is of english origin.

laws and customs are frequently to be met with in the united states which contrast strongly with all that surrounds them. these laws seem to be drawn up in a spirit contrary to the prevailing tenor of the american legislation; and these customs are no less opposed to the general tone of society. if the english colonies had been founded in an age of darkness, or if their origin was already lost in the lapse of years, the problem would be insoluble.

i shall quote a single example to illustrate what i advance.

the civil and criminal procedure of the americans has only two means of action—committal or bail. the first measure taken by the magistrate is to exact security from the defendant, or, in case of refusal, to incarcerate him: the ground of the accusation, and the importance of the charges against him are then discussed.

it is evident that a legislation of this kind is hostile to the poor man, and favorable only to the rich. the poor man has not always a security to produce, even in a civil cause: and if he is obliged to wait for justice in prison, he is speedily reduced to distress. the wealthy individual, on the contrary, always escapes imprisonment in civil causes; nay, more, he may readily elude the punishment which awaits him for a delinquency, by breaking his bail. so that all the penalties of the law are, for him, reducible to fines.{54} nothing can be more aristocratic than this system of legislation. yet in america it is the poor who make the law, and they usually reserve the greatest social advantages to themselves. the explanation of the phenomenon is to be found in england; the laws of which i speak are english,{55} and the americans have retained them, however repugnant they may be to the tenor of their legislation, and the mass of their ideas.

next to its habits, the thing which a nation is least apt to change is its civil legislation. civil laws are only familiarly known to legal men, whose direct interest it is to maintain them as they are, whether good or bad, simply because they themselves are conversant with them. the body of the nation is scarcely acquainted with them: it merely perceives their action in particular cases; but it has some difficulty in seizing their tendency, and obeys them without reflection.

i have quoted one instance where it would have been easy to adduce a great number of others.

the surface of american society is, if i may use the expression, covered with a layer of democracy, from beneath which the old aristocratic colors sometimes peep.