now these utopian statesmen who founded the world state put the problem of social organisation in the following fashion:— to contrive a revolutionary movement that shall absorb all existing governments and fuse them with itself, and that must be rapidly progressive and adaptable, and yet coherent, persistent, powerful, and efficient.

the problem of combining progress with political stability had never been accomplished in utopia before that time, any more than it has been accomplished on earth. just as on earth, utopian history was a succession of powers rising and falling in an alternation of efficient conservative with unstable liberal states. just as on earth, so in utopia, the kinetic type of men had displayed a more or less unintentional antagonism to the poietic. the general life-history of a state had been the same on either planet. first, through poietic activities, the idea of a community has developed, and the state has shaped itself; poietic men have arisen first in this department of national life, and then that, and have given place to kinetic men of a high type — for it seems to be in their nature that poietic men should be mutually repulsive, and not succeed and develop one another consecutively — and a period of expansion and vigour has set in. the general poietic activity has declined with the development of an efficient and settled social and political organisation; the statesman has given way to the politician who has incorporated the wisdom of the statesman with his own energy, the original genius in arts, letters, science, and every department of activity to the cultivated and scholarly man. the kinetic man of wide range, who has assimilated his poietic predecessor, succeeds with far more readiness than his poietic contemporary in almost every human activity. the latter is by his very nature undisciplined and experimental, and is positively hampered by precedents and good order. with this substitution of the efficient for the creative type, the state ceases to grow, first in this department of activity, and then in that, and so long as its conditions remain the same it remains orderly and efficient. but it has lost its power of initiative and change; its power of adaptation is gone, and with that secular change of conditions which is the law of life, stresses must arise within and without, and bring at last either through revolution or through defeat the release of fresh poietic power. the process, of course, is not in its entirety simple; it may be masked by the fact that one department of activity may be in its poietic stage, while another is in a phase of realisation. in the united states of america, for example, during the nineteenth century, there was great poietic activity in industrial organisation, and none whatever in political philosophy; but a careful analysis of the history of any period will show the rhythm almost invariably present, and the initial problem before the utopian philosopher, therefore, was whether this was an inevitable alternation, whether human progress was necessarily a series of developments, collapses, and fresh beginnings, after an interval of disorder, unrest, and often great unhappiness, or whether it was possible to maintain a secure, happy, and progressive state beside an unbroken flow of poietic activity.

clearly they decided upon the second alternative. if, indeed, i am listening to my utopian self, then they not only decided the problem could be solved, but they solved it.

he tells me how they solved it.

a modern utopia differs from all the older utopias in its recognition of the need of poietic activities — one sees this new consideration creeping into thought for the first time in the phrasing of comte’s insistence that “spiritual” must precede political reconstruction, and in his admission of the necessity of recurrent books and poems about utopias — and at first this recognition appears to admit only an added complication to a problem already unmanageably complex. comte’s separation of the activities of a state into the spiritual and material does, to a certain extent, anticipate this opposition of poietic and kinetic, but the intimate texture of his mind was dull and hard, the conception slipped from him again, and his suppression of literary activities, and his imposition of a rule of life upon the poietic types, who are least able to sustain it, mark how deeply he went under. to a large extent he followed the older utopists in assuming that the philosophical and constructive problem could be done once for all, and he worked the results out simply under an organised kinetic government. but what seems to be merely an addition to the difficulty may in the end turn out to be a simplification, just as the introduction of a fresh term to an intricate irreducible mathematical expression will at times bring it to unity.

now philosophers after my utopian pattern, who find the ultimate significance in life in individuality, novelty and the undefined, would not only regard the poietic element as the most important in human society, but would perceive quite clearly the impossibility of its organisation. this, indeed, is simply the application to the moral and intellectual fabric of the principles already applied in discussing the state control of reproduction (in chapter the sixth, section 2). but just as in the case of births it was possible for the state to frame limiting conditions within which individuality plays more freely than in the void, so the founders of this modern utopia believed it possible to define conditions under which every individual born with poietic gifts should be enabled and encouraged to give them a full development, in art, philosophy, invention, or discovery. certain general conditions presented themselves as obviously reasonable:— to give every citizen as good an education as he or she could acquire, for example; to so frame it that the directed educational process would never at any period occupy the whole available time of the learner, but would provide throughout a marginal free leisure with opportunities for developing idiosyncrasies, and to ensure by the expedient of a minimum wage for a specified amount of work, that leisure and opportunity did not cease throughout life.

but, in addition to thus making poietic activities universally possible, the founders of this modern utopia sought to supply incentives, which was an altogether more difficult research, a problem in its nature irresolvably complex, and admitting of no systematic solution. but my double told me of a great variety of devices by which poietic men and women were given honour and enlarged freedoms, so soon as they produced an earnest of their quality, and he explained to me how great an ambition they might entertain.

there were great systems of laboratories attached to every municipal force station at which research could be conducted under the most favourable conditions, and every mine, and, indeed, almost every great industrial establishment, was saddled under its lease with similar obligations. so much for poietic ability and research in physical science. the world state tried the claims of every living contributor to any materially valuable invention, and paid or charged a royalty on its use that went partly to him personally, and partly to the research institution that had produced him. in the matter of literature and the philosophical and sociological sciences, every higher educational establishment carried its studentships, its fellowships, its occasional lectureships, and to produce a poem, a novel, a speculative work of force or merit, was to become the object of a generous competition between rival universities. in utopia, any author has the option either of publishing his works through the public bookseller as a private speculation, or, if he is of sufficient merit, of accepting a university endowment and conceding his copyright to the university press. all sorts of grants in the hands of committees of the most varied constitution, supplemented these academic resources, and ensured that no possible contributor to the wide flow of the utopian mind slipped into neglect. apart from those who engaged mainly in teaching and administration, my double told me that the world-wide house of saloman [footnote: the new atlantis.] thus created sustained over a million men. for all the rarity of large fortunes, therefore, no original man with the desire and capacity for material or mental experiments went long without resources and the stimulus of attention, criticism, and rivalry.

“and finally,” said my double, “our rules ensure a considerable understanding of the importance of poietic activities in the majority of the samurai, in whose hands as a class all the real power of the world resides.”

“ah!” said i, “and now we come to the thing that interests me most. for it is quite clear, in my mind, that these samurai form the real body of the state. all this time that i have spent going to and fro in this planet, it has been growing upon me that this order of men and women, wearing such a uniform as you wear, and with faces strengthened by discipline and touched with devotion, is the utopian reality; but that for them, the whole fabric of these fair appearances would crumble and tarnish, shrink and shrivel, until at last, back i should be amidst the grime and disorders of the life of earth. tell me about these samurai, who remind me of plato’s guardians, who look like knights templars, who bear a name that recalls the swordsmen of japan . . . and whose uniform you yourself are wearing. what are they? are they an hereditary caste, a specially educated order, an elected class? for, certainly, this world turns upon them as a door upon its hinges.”