suppose, now, there is such a thing as an all-round inferior race. is that any reason why we should propose to preserve it for ever in a condition of tutelage? whether there is a race so inferior i do not know, but certainly there is no race so superior as to be trusted with human charges. the true answer to aristotle’s plea for slavery, that there are “natural slaves,” lies in the fact that there are no “natural” masters. power is no more to be committed to men without discipline and restriction than alcohol. the true objection to slavery is not that it is unjust to the inferior but that it corrupts the superior. there is only one sane and logical thing to be done with a really inferior race, and that is to exterminate it.

now there are various ways of exterminating a race, and most of them are cruel. you may end it with fire and sword after the old hebrew fashion; you may enslave it and work it to death, as the spaniards did the caribs; you may set it boundaries and then poison it slowly with deleterious commodities, as the americans do with most of their indians; you may incite it to wear clothing to which it is not accustomed and to live under new and strange conditions that will expose it to infectious diseases to which you yourselves are immune, as the missionaries do the polynesians; you may resort to honest simple murder, as we english did with the tasmanians; or you can maintain such conditions as conduce to “race suicide,” as the british administration does in fiji. suppose, then, for a moment, that there is an all-round inferior race; a modern utopia is under the hard logic of life, and it would have to exterminate such a race as quickly as it could. on the whole, the fijian device seems the least cruel. but utopia would do that without any clumsiness of race distinction, in exactly the same manner, and by the same machinery, as it exterminates all its own defective and inferior strains; that is to say, as we have already discussed in chapter the fifth, section 1, by its marriage laws, and by the laws of the minimum wage. that extinction need never be discriminatory. if any of the race did, after all, prove to be fit to survive, they would survive — they would be picked out with a sure and automatic justice from the over-ready condemnation of all their kind.

is there, however, an all-round inferior race in the world? even the australian black-fellow is, perhaps, not quite so entirely eligible for extinction as a good, wholesome, horse-racing, sheep-farming australian white may think. these queer little races, the black-fellows, the pigmies, the bushmen, may have their little gifts, a greater keenness, a greater fineness of this sense or that, a quaintness of the imagination or what not, that may serve as their little unique addition to the totality of our utopian civilisation. we are supposing that every individual alive on earth is alive in utopia, and so all the surviving “black-fellows” are there. every one of them in utopia has had what none have had on earth, a fair education and fair treatment, justice, and opportunity. suppose that the common idea is right about the general inferiority of these people, then it would follow that in utopia most of them are childless, and working at or about the minimum wage, and some will have passed out of all possibility of offspring under the hand of the offended law; but still — cannot we imagine some few of these little people — whom you must suppose neither naked nor clothed in the european style, but robed in the utopian fashion — may have found some delicate art to practise, some peculiar sort of carving, for example, that justifies god in creating them? utopia has sound sanitary laws, sound social laws, sound economic laws; what harm are these people going to do?

some may be even prosperous and admired, may have married women of their own or some other race, and so may be transmitting that distinctive thin thread of excellence, to take its due place in the great synthesis of the future.

and, indeed, coming along that terrace in utopia, i see a little figure, a little bright-eyed, bearded man, inky black, frizzy haired, and clad in a white tunic and black hose, and with a mantle of lemon yellow wrapped about his shoulders. he walks, as most utopians walk, as though he had reason to be proud of something, as though he had no reason to be afraid of anything in the world. he carries a portfolio in his hand. it is that, i suppose, as much as his hair, that recalls the quartier latin to my mind.