it were a piece of vain flattery to pretend that this work on clothes entirely contents us; that it is not, like all works of genius, like the very sun, which, though the highest published creation, or work of genius, has nevertheless black spots and troubled nebulosities amid its effulgence, — a mixture of insight, inspiration, with dulness, double-vision, and even utter blindness.
without committing ourselves to those enthusiastic praises and prophesyings of the weissnichtwo’sche anzeiger, we admitted that the book had in a high degree excited us to self-activity, which is the best effect of any book; that it had even operated changes in our way of thought; nay, that it promised to prove, as it were, the opening of a new mine-shaft, wherein the whole world of speculation might henceforth dig to unknown depths. more specially may it now be declared that professor teufelsdrockh’s acquirements, patience of research, philosophic and even poetic vigor, are here made indisputably manifest; and unhappily no less his prolixity and tortuosity and manifold ineptitude; that, on the whole, as in opening new mine-shafts is not unreasonable, there is much rubbish in his book, though likewise specimens of almost invaluable ore. a paramount popularity in england we cannot promise him. apart from the choice of such a topic as clothes, too often the manner of treating it betokens in the author a rusticity and academic seclusion, unblamable, indeed inevitable in a german, but fatal to his success with our public.
of good society teufelsdrockh appears to have seen little, or has mostly forgotten what he saw. he speaks out with a strange plainness; calls many things by their mere dictionary names. to him the upholsterer is no pontiff, neither is any drawing-room a temple, were it never so begilt and overhung: “a whole immensity of brussels carpets, and pier-glasses, and ormolu,” as he himself expresses it, “cannot hide from me that such drawing-room is simply a section of infinite space, where so many god-created souls do for the time meet together.” to teufelsdrockh the highest duchess is respectable, is venerable; but nowise for her pearl bracelets and malines laces: in his eyes, the star of a lord is little less and little more than the broad button of birmingham spelter in a clown’s smock; “each is an implement,” he says, “in its kind; a tag for hooking-together; and, for the rest, was dug from the earth, and hammered on a stithy before smith’s fingers.” thus does the professor look in men’s faces with a strange impartiality, a strange scientific freedom; like a man unversed in the higher circles, like a man dropped thither from the moon. rightly considered, it is in this peculiarity, running through his whole system of thought, that all these shortcomings, over-shootings, and multiform perversities, take rise: if indeed they have not a second source, also natural enough, in his transcendental philosophies, and humor of looking at all matter and material things as spirit; whereby truly his case were but the more hopeless, the more lamentable.
to the thinkers of this nation, however, of which class it is firmly believed there are individuals yet extant, we can safely recommend the work: nay, who knows but among the fashionable ranks too, if it be true, as teufelsdrockh maintains, that “within the most starched cravat there passes a windpipe and weasand, and under the thickliest embroidered waistcoat beats a heart,” — the force of that rapt earnestness may be felt, and here and there an arrow of the soul pierce through? in our wild seer, shaggy, unkempt, like a baptist living on locusts and wild honey, there is an untutored energy, a silent, as it were unconscious, strength, which, except in the higher walks of literature, must be rare. many a deep glance, and often with unspeakable precision, has he cast into mysterious nature, and the still more mysterious life of man. wonderful it is with what cutting words, now and then, he severs asunder the confusion; sheers down, were it furlongs deep; into the true centre of the matter; and there not only hits the nail on the head, but with crushing force smites it home, and buries it. — on the other hand, let us be free to admit, he is the most unequal writer breathing. often after some such feat, he will play truant for long pages, and go dawdling and dreaming, and mumbling and maundering the merest commonplaces, as if he were asleep with eyes open, which indeed he is.
of his boundless learning, and how all reading and literature in most known tongues, from sanchoniathon to dr. lingard, from your oriental shasters, and talmuds, and korans, with cassini’s siamese fables, and laplace’s mecanique celeste, down to robinson crusoe and the belfast town and country almanack, are familiar to him, — we shall say nothing: for unexampled as it is with us, to the germans such universality of study passes without wonder, as a thing commendable, indeed, but natural, indispensable, and there of course. a man that devotes his life to learning, shall he not be learned?
in respect of style our author manifests the same genial capability, marred too often by the same rudeness, inequality, and apparent want of intercourse with the higher classes. occasionally, as above hinted, we find consummate vigor, a true inspiration; his burning thoughts step forth in fit burning words, like so many full-formed minervas, issuing amid flame and splendor from jove’s head; a rich, idiomatic diction, picturesque allusions, fiery poetic emphasis, or quaint tricksy turns; all the graces and terrors of a wild imagination, wedded to the clearest intellect, alternate in beautiful vicissitude. were it not that sheer sleeping and soporific passages; circumlocutions, repetitions, touches even of pure doting jargon, so often intervene! on the whole, professor teufelsdrockh, is not a cultivated writer. of his sentences perhaps not more than nine-tenths stand straight on their legs; the remainder are in quite angular attitudes, buttressed up by props (of parentheses and dashes), and ever with this or the other tagrag hanging from them; a few even sprawl out helplessly on all sides, quite broken-backed and dismembered. nevertheless, in almost his very worst moods, there lies in him a singular attraction. a wild tone pervades the whole utterance of the man, like its keynote and regulator; now screwing itself aloft as into the song of spirits, or else the shrill mockery of fiends; now sinking in cadences, not without melodious heartiness, though sometimes abrupt enough, into the common pitch, when we hear it only as a monotonous hum; of which hum the true character is extremely difficult to fix. up to this hour we have never fully satisfied ourselves whether it is a tone and hum of real humor, which we reckon among the very highest qualities of genius, or some echo of mere insanity and inanity, which doubtless ranks below the very lowest.
under a like difficulty, in spite even of our personal intercourse, do we still lie with regard to the professor’s moral feeling. gleams of an ethereal love burst forth from him, soft wailings of infinite pity; he could clasp the whole universe into his bosom, and keep it warm; it seems as if under that rude exterior there dwelt a very seraph. then again he is so sly and still, so imperturbably saturnine; shows such indifference, malign coolness towards all that men strive after; and ever with some half-visible wrinkle of a bitter sardonic humor, if indeed it be not mere stolid callousness, — that you look on him almost with a shudder, as on some incarnate mephistopheles, to whom this great terrestrial and celestial round, after all, were but some huge foolish whirligig, where kings and beggars, and angels and demons, and stars and street-sweepings, were chaotically whirled, in which only children could take interest. his look, as we mentioned, is probably the gravest ever seen: yet it is not of that cast-iron gravity frequent enough among our own chancery suitors; but rather the gravity as of some silent, high-encircled mountain-pool, perhaps the crater of an extinct volcano; into whose black deeps you fear to gaze: those eyes, those lights that sparkle in it, may indeed be reflexes of the heavenly stars, but perhaps also glances from the region of nether fire.
certainly a most involved, self-secluded, altogether enigmatic nature, this of teufelsdrockh! here, however, we gladly recall to mind that once we saw him laugh; once only, perhaps it was the first and last time in his life; but then such a peal of laughter, enough to have awakened the seven sleepers! it was of jean paul’s doing: some single billow in that vast world–mahlstrom of humor, with its heaven-kissing coruscations, which is now, alas, all congealed in the frost of death! the large-bodied poet and the small, both large enough in soul, sat talking miscellaneously together, the present editor being privileged to listen; and now paul, in his serious way, was giving one of those inimitable “extra–harangues;” and, as it chanced, on the proposal for a cast-metal king: gradually a light kindled in our professor’s eyes and face, a beaming, mantling, loveliest light; through those murky features, a radiant ever-young apollo looked; and he burst forth like the neighing of all tattersall’s, — tears streaming down his cheeks, pipe held aloft, foot clutched into the air, — loud, long-continuing, uncontrollable; a laugh not of the face and diaphragm only, but of the whole man from head to heel. the present editor, who laughed indeed, yet with measure, began to fear all was not right: however, teufelsdrockh, composed himself, and sank into his old stillness; on his inscrutable countenance there was, if anything, a slight look of shame; and richter himself could not rouse him again. readers who have any tincture of psychology know how much is to be inferred from this; and that no man who has once heartily and wholly laughed can be altogether irreclaimably bad. how much lies in laughter: the cipher-key, wherewith we decipher the whole man! some men wear an everlasting barren simper; in the smile of others lies a cold glitter as of ice: the fewest are able to laugh, what can be called laughing, but only sniff and titter and snigger from the throat outwards; or at best, produce some whiffling husky cachinnation, as if they were laughing through wool: of none such comes good. the man who cannot laugh is not only fit for treasons, stratagems, and spoils; but his whole life is already a treason and a stratagem.
considered as an author, herr teufelsdrockh has one scarcely pardonable fault, doubtless his worst: an almost total want of arrangement. in this remarkable volume, it is true, his adherence to the mere course of time produces, through the narrative portions, a certain show of outward method; but of true logical method and sequence there is too little. apart from its multifarious sections and subdivisions, the work naturally falls into two parts; a historical–descriptive, and a philosophical–speculative: but falls, unhappily, by no firm line of demarcation; in that labyrinthic combination, each part overlaps, and indents, and indeed runs quite through the other. many sections are of a debatable rubric, or even quite nondescript and unnamable; whereby the book not only loses in accessibility, but too often distresses us like some mad banquet, wherein all courses had been confounded, and fish and flesh, soup and solid, oyster-sauce, lettuces, rhine-wine and french mustard, were hurled into one huge tureen or trough, and the hungry public invited to help itself. to bring what order we can out of this chaos shall be part of our endeavor.
