loggan, in his invaluable cantabrigia illustrata, gives us two views of the court of clare, the first a bird’s-eye view of the whole building, the second an elevation of the north side, as it was completed at the end of queen anne’s reign. the college had to pass through some trouble before its buildings were completed. after its foundation in 1342, a court was built which lasted till 1525. it was then injured by fire. the remains were taken down, and preparations were made for a new building, which was not begun till 1638, an unfortunate period. during the civil wars, the work was at a standstill, and the north side, built principally during the mastership of dr samuel blythe (1678-1713), was not actually finished till 1715. sir george downing, then a fellow commoner, contributed to its completion. later, in 1769,[45] the present chapel was built from the designs of the master of caius, sir james burrough. clare thus presents examples of three distinct periods in renaissance work. the earliest portion is the eastern side of the court with the gateway, the beauty of which cannot be too highly praised. the style is the fantastic italian gothic of the period, mixed largely with classical forms; but the work is free from what mr ruskin would call insincerity. it is useful to compare it with the chapel at peterhouse, consecrated five years before this was begun. its characteristics are those of all the cultured work of the early stewart period, and have points in common with a building like ingestre hall near stafford, which has unfortunately perished by fire. the south side is of the same date; the admirable proportions of this part of the court may be seen from the grounds of king’s. on the western side is a building of the time of charles ii. and james ii. its inner face harmonises fairly well with the rest, but debased forms, such as the meaningless broken arch, appear. the river front is pure palladian, and the effect of[46] the order of pilasters which runs through the two upper stories is very harsh. the northern face of the court is good, solid, ugly queen anne work, which has, of late years, been spoiled rather than improved. on this side is the hall with great sash-windows, which the famous clare creeper does not succeed in hiding. the chapel is a plain building of excellent proportions. internally, it has most of the virtues and faults of a georgian college chapel: the domical antechapel is an original feature. on the whole, clare, which covers less ground than most colleges, is, architecturally, among the best; but it is a pity that all was not carried out in the style of the western side, which is almost unrivalled in any country, considering its date. the celebrated bridge, not unlike the kitchen bridge at st john’s, belongs to the reign of charles i. and is therefore contemporary with the older part of the court. it is well set off by its charming surroundings. the architect of this bridge, completed in 1640, was robert grumbold, who was master-mason to the college, and worked at great st mary’s as well as at clare.
the idea of clare hall originated with richard de badew, who, in 1326, while chancellor of the university, founded a small college called university hall. the first master of this new foundation was walter of thaxted. but, in the twelfth year of its existence, the college was burned down. usually the present college dates its foundation from 1338, when the rebuilding began, but the actual date at[49] which elizabeth de burgh took over the foundation was 1342. she was daughter and coheir of gilbert, count of clare, hertford and gloucester. clare lies on the border of suffolk and essex, and the college was essentially an essex colony. two of the early masters, walter of thaxted and william of radwinter, came from villages in the same part of the county, and their names, occurring not far apart, argue a certain feeling in favour of natives of the district. there was for a long time a tradition that clare hall was the soler hall of chaucer’s reve’s tale, but it is not necessary to suppose that chaucer had any particular college in his mind. his use of the epithet “great” may point to clare and distinguish it from the numerous hostels which were then springing up in cambridge; but there can be no certainty on the point. chaucer merely borrowed a tale from boccaccio and put it into english dress, without any particular accuracy of detail.
clare has, on the whole, no very momentous annals. hugh latimer,* the famous bishop of worcester, was a member of this foundation, and,[50] as fellow of clare, preached in st edward’s church. until the foundation of king’s, the chapel of clare was the parish church of st john the baptist, which stood on the south side of the college. after st john’s had been removed to make way for king’s, clare shared the possession of st edward’s church with trinity hall. latimer, however, is by no means the typical theologian of clare. the worthies of the college are chiefly religious, and, a century after, it contributed to the laudian revival. when james i. paid his visit to cambridge, he was entertained with a comedy at clare. the name of the piece was “ignoramus” and its author was mr george ruggle, one of the society. it satirised the civil law, which was then doing its best to oust the canon law, and james, who always had a keen sympathy for the obsolete, was hugely delighted. some years before, ruggle had satirised the townsfolk in a play called club-law, to which the corporation were invited. the absence of good feeling which marked such an invitation explains the “town and gown rows” common at this period.
a less festive spirit than george ruggle was nicholas ferrar,* who appears at clare about the same time. ferrar ranks with herbert and crashaw as the third of the mystics and pietists whom cambridge sent out during the seventeenth century. he became famous as the head of what he called the “protestant nunnery.” it was established at little gidding, an out-of-the-way village in huntingdonshire, and consisted of[51] ferrar, some members of his family, and some near relations, who devoted themselves to contemplation and works of piety. the neighbourhood of little gidding to cambridge was probably felt in the university, and there is the strongest probability that men like cosin and andrewes came over from cambridge very often, and went into retreat, as we say, with ferrar. a man of this type was the great peter gunning,* fellow of clare and lady margaret professor of divinity. in 1661 he exchanged his offices for those of regius professor and master of corpus, which he soon left for st john’s.
while the new court of clare was building, the commonwealth came, and with it the mastership of ralph cudworth. this profound thinker held the chair of hebrew with his mastership, and continued to hold it till his death in 1688. he is certainly one of the most extraordinary figures of his age at cambridge, but his history and that of the band whose leader he was, belong more properly to the annals of christ’s. almost a contemporary of cudworth’s was archbishop tillotson,* who, at this date in his career, was a puritan, like many of the youth at cambridge. he later found his true vocation in the church of england, and his sermons have achieved a greater fame than cudworth’s abstract treatises, although their merits are perhaps less.
theophilus dillingham succeeded cudworth, and was archdeacon of bedford as well as master. he continued the buildings, and a successful completion was reached under the[52] subsequent mastership of samuel blythe. from this time forward the history of clare was peaceful and monotonous. it produced a very eccentric son in william whiston, known as the admirable translator of josephus. whiston was an astronomer and a proficient mathematician. he preceded sir isaac newton as lucasian professor, resigning his chair in 1711. he was always open to the influence of new and uncommon theories, and died a baptist with a strong tendency to fifth-monarchy principles.
clare was the college of that famous statesman, thomas holles pelham,* duke of newcastle, whose personal peculiarities are ridiculed in smollett’s humphrey clinker. pelham was chancellor of the university from 1748 to 1768, having previously filled the office of high steward. his chancellorship is the last important event in the history of the college. it has, since then, under the fortunate and prolonged rule of four masters, extending over a century and a half, maintained its ancient prestige, and now, although one of the smallest of the colleges in point of buildings, the number of its undergraduates is exceptionally large and shows no signs of decreasing. among its present members it numbers several men of great eminence, of whom, to cambridge men, the most familiar is the present woodwardian professor, dr mckenny hughes.
