what harm can the prediction of jean jacques do to russia? any? we allow him to explain it in a mystical, typical, allegorical sense, according to custom. the nations which will destroy the russians will possess the belles-lettres, mathematics, wit, and politeness, which degrade man and pervert nature.
from five to six thousand pamphlets have been printed in holland against louis xiv., none of which contributed to make him lose the battles of blenheim, turin, and ramillies.
in general, we have as natural a right to make use of our pens as our language, at our peril, risk, and fortune. i know many books which fatigue, but i know of none which have done real evil. theologians, or pretended politicians, cry: “religion is destroyed, the government is lost, if you print certain truths or certain paradoxes. never attempt to think, till you have demanded permission from a monk or an officer. it is against good order for a man to think for himself. homer, plato, cicero, virgil, pliny, horace, never published anything but with the approbation of the doctors of the sorbonne and of the holy inquisition.”
“see into what horrible decay the liberty of the press brought england and holland. it is true that they possess the commerce of the whole world, and that england is victorious on sea and land; but it is merely a false greatness, a false opulence: they hasten with long strides to their ruin. an enlightened people cannot exist.”
none can reason more justly, my friends; but let us see, if you please, what state has been lost by a book. the most dangerous, the most pernicious of all, is that of spinoza. not only in the character of a jew he attacks the new testament, but in the character of a scholar he ruins the old; his system of atheism is a thousand times better composed and reasoned than those of straton and of epicurus. we have need of the most profound sagacity to answer to the arguments by which he endeavors to prove that one substance cannot form another.
like yourself, i detest this book, which i perhaps understand better than you, and to which you have very badly replied; but have you discovered that this book has changed the face of the world? has any preacher lost a florin of his income by the publication of the works of spinoza? is there a bishop whose rents have diminished? on the contrary, their revenues have doubled since his time: all the ill is reduced to a small number of peaceable readers, who have examined the arguments of spinoza in their closets, and have written for or against them works but little known.
for yourselves, it is of little consequence to have caused to be printed “ad usum delphini,” the atheism of lucretius — as you have already been reproached with doing — no trouble, no scandal, has ensued from it: so leave spinoza to live in peace in holland. lucretius was left in repose at rome.
but if there appears among you any new book, the ideas of which shock your own — supposing you have any — or of which the author may be of a party contrary to yours — or what is worse, of which the author may not be of any party at all — then you cry out “fire!” and let all be noise, scandal, and uproar in your small corner of the earth. there is an abominable man who has printed that if we had no hands we could not make shoes nor stockings. devotees cry out, furred doctors assemble, alarms multiply from college to college, from house to house, and why? for five or six pages, about which there no longer will be a question at the end of three months. does a book displease you? refute it. does it tire you? read it not.
oh! say you to me, the books of luther and calvin have destroyed the roman catholic religion in one-half of europe? why say not also, that the books of the patriarch photius have destroyed this roman religion in asia, africa, greece, and russia?
you deceive yourself very grossly, when you think that you have been ruined by books. the empire of russia is two thousand leagues in extent, and there are not six men who are aware of the points disputed by the greek and latin church. if the monk luther, john calvin, and the vicar zuinglius had been content with writing, rome would yet subjugate all the states that it has lost; but these people and their adherents ran from town to town, from house to house, exciting the women, and were maintained by princes. fury, which tormented amata, and which, according to virgil, whipped her like a top, was not more turbulent. know, that one enthusiastic, factious, ignorant, supple, vehement capuchin, the emissary of some ambitious monks, preaching, confessing, communicating, and caballing, will much sooner overthrow a province than a hundred authors can enlighten it. it was not the koran which caused mahomet to succeed: it was mahomet who caused the success of the koran.
no! rome has not been vanquished by books; it has been so by having caused europe to revolt at its rapacity; by the public sale of indulgences; for having insulted men, and wishing to govern them like domestic animals; for having abused its power to such an extent that it is astonishing a single village remains to it. henry viii., elizabeth, the duke of saxe, the landgrave of hesse, the princes of orange, the condés and colignys, have done all, and books nothing. trumpets have never gained battles, nor caused any walls to fall except those of jericho.
you fear books, as certain small cantons fear violins. let us read, and let us dance — these two amusements will never do any harm to the world.
