this claim has been made for almost all the olympians, but in some cases appears more plausible than in others. for example, apollo is regarded as a solar divinity, and the modes in which he attained his detached and independent position as a brilliant anthropomorphic deity, patron of art, the lover of the nymphs, the inspirer of prophecy, may have been something in this fashion. first the sun may have been regarded (in the manner familiar to savage races) as a personal being. in homer he is still the god “who sees and hears all things,”61 and who beholds and reveals the loves of ares and aphrodite. this personal character of the sun is well illustrated in the homeric hymn to hyperion, the sun that dwells on high, where, as mr. max müller says, “the words would seem to imply that the poet looked upon helios as a half-god, almost as a hero, who had once lived upon earth”.62 it has already been shown that this mythical theory of the origin of the sun is met with among the aztecs and the bushmen.63 in homer, the sun, helios hyperion, though he sees and hears all things,64 needs to be informed by one of the nymphs that the companions of odysseus have devoured his sacred cattle. in the same way the supreme baiame of australia needs to ask questions of mortals. apollo then speaks in the olympian assembly, and threatens that if he is not avenged he will “go down to hades and shine among the dead”. the sun is capable of marriage, as in the bulgarian volkslied, where he marries a peasant girl,65 and, by perse, he is the father of circe and ?etes.66

according to the early lyric poet stesichorus, the sun sails over ocean in a golden cup or bowl. “then helios hyperionides went down into his golden cup to cross ocean-stream, and come to the deeps of dark and sacred night, to his mother, and his wedded wife, and his children dear.” this belief, in more barbaric shape, still survives in the greek islands.67 “the sun is still to them a giant, like hyperion, bloodthirsty when tinged with gold. the common saying is that the sun ‘when he seeks his kingdom’ expects to find forty loaves prepared for him by his mother. . . . woe to her if the loaves be not ready! the sun eats his brothers, sisters, father and mother in his wrath.”68 a well-known amour of helios was his intrigue with rhode by whom he had phaethon and his sisters. the tragedians told how phaethon drove the chariot of the sun, and upset it, while his sisters were turned into poplar trees, and their tears became amber.69

such were the myths about the personal sun, the hero or demigod, helios hyperion. if we are to believe that apollo also is a solar deity, it appears probable that he is a more advanced conception, not of the sun as a person, but of a being who represents the sun in the spiritual world, and who exercises, by an act of will, the same influence as the actual sun possesses by virtue of his rays. thus he brings pestilence on the ach?ans in the first book of the iliad, and his viewless shafts slay men suddenly, as sunstroke does. it is a pretty coincidence that a german scholar, otfried müller, who had always opposed apollo’s claim to be a sun-god, was killed by a sunstroke at delphi. the god avenged himself in his ancient home. but if this deity was once merely the sun, it may be said, in the beautiful phrase of paul de st. victor, “pareil a une statue qui surgit des flammes de son moule, apollo se degage vite du soleil”.70 he becomes a god of manifold functions and attributes, and it is necessary to exercise extreme caution in explaining any one myth of his legend as originally a myth of the sun.71 phoibos certainly means “the brilliant” or “shining”. it is, however, unnecessary to hold that such epithets as lyceius, lycius, lycegenes indicate “light,” and are not connected, as the ancients, except macrobius, believed, with the worship of the wolf.72 the character of apollo as originally a sun-god is asserted on the strength not only of his names, but of many of his attributes and his festivals. it is pointed out that he is the deity who superintends the measurement of time.73 “the chief days in the year’s reckoning, the new and full moons and the seventh and twentieth days of the month, also the beginning of the solar year, are reckoned apolline.” that curious ritual of the daphnephoria, familiar to many english people from sir frederick leighton’s picture, is believed to have symbolised the year. proclus says that a staff of olive wood decorated with flowers supported a central ball of brass beneath which was a smaller ball, and thence little globes were hung.74

the greater ball means the sun, the smaller the moon, the tiny globes the stars and the 365 laurel garlands used in the feast are understood to symbolise the days. pausanias75 says that the ceremony was of extreme antiquity. heracles had once been the youth who led the procession, and the tripod which amphitryon dedicated for him was still to be seen at thebes in the second century of our era. another proof of apollo’s connection with the sun is derived from the cessation of his rites at delphi during the three winter months which were devoted to dionysus.76 the sacred birthday feasts of the god are also connected with the year’s renewal.77 once more, his conflict with the great dragon, the pytho, is understood as a symbol of the victory of light and warmth over the darkness and cold of winter.

the discomfiture of a dragon by a god is familiar in the myth of the defeat of ahi or vritra by indra, and it is a curious coincidence that apollo, like indra, fled in terror after slaying his opponent. apollo, according to the myth, was purified of the guilt of the slaying (a ceremony unknown to homer) at tempe.78 according to the myth, the python was a snake which forbade access to the chasm whence rose the mysterious fumes of divination. apollo slew the snake and usurped the oracle. his murder of the serpent was more or less resented by the delphians of the time.79

the snake, like the other animals, frogs and lizards, in andaman, australian and iroquois myth, had swallowed the waters before its murder.80 whether the legend of the slaying of the python was or was not originally an allegory of the defeat of winter by sunlight, it certainly at a very early period became mixed up with ancient legal ideas and local traditions. it is almost as necessary for a young god or hero to slay monsters as for a young lady to be presented at court; and we may hesitate to explain all these legends of an useful feat of courage as nature-myths. in the homeric hymn to apollo pythius, the monster is called drac?na, the female form of drakon. the drakos and his wife are still popular bogies in modern greek superstition and folk-song.81

the monster is the fosterling of hera in the homeric hymn, and the bane of flocks and herds. she is somehow connected with the fable of the birth of the monster typhoeus, son of hera without a father. the homeric hymn derives pythius, the name of the god, from [greek], “rot,” the disdainful speech of apollo to the dead monster, “for there the pest rotted away beneath the beams of the sun”. the derivation is a volks-etymologie. it is not clear whether the poet connected in his mind the sun and the god. the local legend of the dragon-slaying was kept alive in men’s minds at delphi by a mystery-play, in which the encounter was represented in action. in one version of the myth the slavery of apollo in the house of admetus was an expiation of the dragon’s death.82 through many of the versions runs the idea that the slaying of the serpent was a deed which required purification and almost apology. if the serpent was really the deity of an elder faith, this would be intelligible, or, if he had kinsfolk, a serpent-tribe in the district, we could understand it. apollo’s next act was to open a new spring of water, as the local nymph was hostile and grudged him her own. this was an inexplicable deed in a sun god, whose business it is to dry up rather than to open water-springs. he gave oracles out of the laurel of delphi, as zeus out of the oaks of dodona.83 presently apollo changed himself into a huge dolphin, and in this guise approached a ship of the cretan mariners.84 he guided, in his dolphin shape, the vessel to crisa, the port of delphi, and then emerged splendid from the waters, and filled his fane with light, a sun-god indeed next, assuming the shape of a man, he revealed himself to the cretans, and bade them worship him in his delphic seat as apollo delphinios, the dolphin-apollo.

such is the ancient tale of the founding of the delphic oracle, in which gods, and beasts, and men are mixed in archaic fashion. it is open to students to regard the dolphin as only one of the many animals whose earlier worship is concentrated in apollo, or to take the creature for the symbol of spring, when seafaring becomes easier to mortals, or to interpret the dolphin as the result of a volks-etymologie, in which the name delphi (meaning originally a hollow in the hills) was connected with delphis, the dolphin.85

on the whole, it seems impossible to get a clear view of apollo as a sun-god from a legend built out of so many varied materials of different dates as the myth of the slaying of the python and the founding of the delphic oracle. nor does the tale of the birth of the god —les enfances apollon— yield much more certain information. the most accessible and the oldest form of the birth-myth is preserved in the homeric hymn to the delian apollo, a hymn intended for recital at the delian festival of the ionian people.

the hymn begins without any account of the amours of zeus and leto; it is merely said that many lands refused to allow leto a place wherein to bring forth her offspring. but barren delos listened to her prayer, and for nine days leto was in labour, surrounded by all the goddesses, save jealous hera and eilithyia, who presides over child-birth. to her iris went with the promise of a golden necklet set with amber studs, and eilithyia came down to the isle, and leto, grasping the trunk of a palm tree, brought forth apollo and artemis.86

such is the narrative of the hymn, in which some interpreters, such as m. decharme, find a rich allegory of the birth of light. leto is regarded as night or darkness, though it is now admitted that this meaning cannot be found in the etymology of her name.87

m. decharme presumes that the palm tree [greek] originally meant the morning red, by aid of which night gives birth to the sun, and if the poet says the young god loves the mountain tops, why, so does the star of day. the moon, however, does not usually arise simultaneously with the dawn, as artemis was born with apollo. it is vain, in fact, to look for minute touches of solar myth in the tale, which rests on the womanly jealousy of hera, and explains the existence of a great fane and feast of apollo, not in one of the rich countries that refused his mother sanctuary, but in a small barren and remote island.88

among the wilder myths which grouped themselves round the figure of apollo was the fable that his mother leto was changed into a wolf. the fable ran that leto, in the shape of a wolf, came in twelve days from the hyperboreans to delos.89 this may be explained as a volks-etymologie from the god’s name, “lycegenes,” which is generally held to mean “born of light”. but the presence of very many animals in the apollo legend and in his temples, corresponding as it does to similar facts already observed in the religion of the lower races, can scarcely be due to popular etymologies alone. the dolphin-apollo has already been remarked.

there are many traces of connection between apollo and the wolf. in athens there was the lyceum of apollo lukios, wolf-apollo, which tradition connected with the primeval strife wherein ?geus (goat-man) defeated lukios (wolfman). the lukian apollo was the deity of the defeated side, as athene of the ?gis (goat-skin) was the deity of the victors.90 the argives had an apollo of the same kind, and the wolf was stamped on their coins.91 according to pausanias, when danaus came seeking the kingship of argos, the people hesitated between him and gelanor. while they were in doubt, a wolf attacked a bull, and the argives determined that the bull should stand for gelanor, the wolf for danaus. the wolf won; danaus was made king, and in gratitude raised an altar to apollo lukios, wolf-apollo. that is (as friends of the totemic system would argue), a man of the wolf-stock dedicated a shrine to the wolf-god.92 in delphi the presence of a bronze image of a wolf was explained by the story that a wolf once revealed the place where stolen temple treasures were concealed. the god’s beast looked after the god’s interest.93 in many myths the children of apollo by mortal girls were exposed, but fostered by wolves.94 in direct contradiction with pausanias, but in accordance with a common rule of mythical interpretation, sophocles95 calls apollo “the wolf-slayer”.

it has very frequently happened that when animals were found closely connected with a god, the ancients explained the fact indifferently by calling the deity the protector or the destroyer of the beasts in question. thus, in the case of apollo, mice were held sacred and were fed in his temples in the troad and elsewhere, the people of hamaxitus especially worshipping mice.96 the god’s name, smintheus, was understood to mean “apollo of the mouse,” or “mouse-apollo ”.97 but while apollo was thus at some places regarded as the patron of mice, other narratives declared that he was adored as sminthian because from mice he had freed the country. this would be a perfectly natural explanation if the vermin which had once been sacred became a pest in the eyes of later generations.98

flies were in this manner connected with the services of apollo. it has already been remarked that an ox was sacrificed to flies near the temple of apollo in leucas. the sacrifice was explained as a device for inducing flies to settle in one spot, and leave the rest of the coast clear. this was an expensive, and would prove a futile arrangement. there was a statue of the locust-apollo (parnopios) in athena the story ran that it was dedicated after the god had banished a plague of locusts.99

a most interesting view of the way in which pious heathens of a late age regarded apollo’s menagerie may be got from plutarch’s essay on the delphic responses. it is the description of a visit to delphi. in the hall of the corinthians the writer and his friends examine the sacred palm tree of bronze, and “the snakes and frogs in relief round the root of the tree”. “why,” said they, “the palm tree is not a marsh plant, and frogs are not a corinthian crest.” and indeed one would think ravens and swans, and hawks and wolves, and anything else than these reptiles would be agreeable to the god. then one of the visitors, serapion, very learnedly showed that apollo was the sun, and that the sun arises from water. “still slipping into the story your lightings up and your exhalations,” cried plutarch, and chaffed him, as one might chaff kuhn, or schwartz, or decharme, about his elemental interpretations. in fact, the classical writers knew rather less than we do about the origin of many of their religious peculiarities.

in connection with sheep, again, apollo was worshipped as the ram apollo.100 at the festival of the carneia a ram was his victim.101 these facts are commonly interpreted as significant of the god’s care for shepherds and the pastoral life, a memory of the days when apollo kept a mortal’s sheep and was the hind of admetus of thessaly. he had animal names derived from sheep and goats, such as maloeis tragios.102 the tale which made apollo the serf and shepherd of mortal men is as old as the iliad,103 and is not easy to interpret, whether as a nature-myth or a local legend. laomedon, one of apollo’s masters, not only refused him his wage, but threatened to put him in chains and sell him to foreign folk across the sea, and to crop his ears with the blade of bronze. these legends may have brought some consolation to the hearts of free men enslaved. a god had borne like calamities, and could feel for their affliction.

to return to the beasts of apollo, in addition to dolphins, mice, rams and wolves, he was constantly associated with lizards (powerful totems in australia), cicalas, hawks, swans, ravens, crows, vultures, all of which are, by mythologists, regarded as symbols of the sun-god, in one or other capacity or function. in the iliad,104 apollo puts on the gear of a hawk, and flits on hawk’s wings down ida, as the thlinkeet yehl does on the feathers of a crane or a raven.

the loves of apollo make up a long and romantic chapter in his legend. they cannot all be so readily explained, as are many of the loves of zeus, by the desire to trace genealogical pedigrees to a god. it is on this principle, however, that the birth of ion, for example, is to be interpreted. the ideal eponymous hero of the ionian race was naturally feigned to be the son of the deity by whose fatherhood all ionians became “brethren in apollo”. once more, when a profession like that of medicine was in the hands of a clan conceiving themselves to be of one blood, and when their common business was under the protection of apollo, they inevitably traced their genealogy to the god. thus the medical clan of the asclepiad?, of which aristotle was a member, derived their origin from asclepius or (as the romans called him) ?sculapius.

so far everything in this myth appears natural and rational, granting the belief in the amours of an anthropomorphic god. but the details of the story are full of that irrational element which is said to “make mythology mythological”. in the third pythian ode pindar sings how apollo was the lover of coronis; how she was faithless to him with a stranger. pindar does not tell how the crow or the raven flew to apollo with the news, and how the god cursed the crow, which had previously been white, that it should for ever be black. then he called his sister, artemis, to slay the false nymph, but snatched from her funeral pyre the babe asclepius, his own begotten. this myth, which explains the colour of the crow as the result of an event and a divine curse, is an example of the stage of thought already illustrated in the namaqua myth of heitsi eibib, and the peculiarities which his curse attached to various animals. there is also a bushman myth according to which certain blackbirds have white breasts, because some women once tied pieces of white fat round their necks.105 it is instructive to observe, as the scholiast on pindar quotes artemon, that pindar omits the incident of the crow as foolish and unworthy. apollo, according to the ode, was himself aware, in his omniscience, of the frailty of coronis. but hesiod, a much earlier poet, tells the story in the usual way, with the curse of the crow, and his consequent change of colour.106 the whole story, in its most ancient shape, and with the omissions suggested by the piety of a later age, is an excellent example of the irrational element in greek myth, of its resemblance to savage myth, and of the tendency of more advanced thought to veil or leave out features revolting to pure religion.107

the connection of asclepius with the serpent was so close that he was received into roman religion in the form of a living snake, while dogs were so intimately connected with his worship that panofka believed him to have been originally a dog-god (roscher, p. 629, revue archeohgique). in another myth apollo succeeds to the paternal honours of a totem. the telmissians in lycia claimed descent from telmessus, who was the child of an amour in which apollo assumed the form of a dog. “in this guise he lay with a daughter of antenor.” probably the lycians of telmissus originally derived their pedigree from a dog, sans phrase and, later, made out that the dog was apollo metamorphosed. this process of veiling a totem, and explaining him away as a saint of the same name, is common in modern india.108

the other loves of apollo are numerous, but it may be sufficient to have examined one such story in detail. where the tale of the amour was not a necessary consequence of the genealogical tendency to connect clans with gods, it was probably, as roscher observes in the case of daphne, an ?tiological myth. many flowers and trees, for example, were nearly connected with the worship and ritual of apollo; among these were notably the laurel, cypress and hyacinth. it is no longer possible to do more than conjecture why each of these plants was thus favoured, though it is a plausible guess that the god attracted into his service various local tree-worships and plant-worships. people would ask why the deity was associated with the flowers and boughs, and the answer would be readily developed on the familiar lines of nature-myth. the laurel is dear to the god because the laurel was once a girl whom he pursued with his love, and who, to escape his embraces, became a tree. the hyacinth and cypress were beautiful youths, dear to apollo, and accidentally slain by him in sport. after their death they became flowers. such myths of metamorphoses, as has been shown, are an universal growth of savage fancy, and spring from the want of a sense of difference between men and things.109

the legend of apollo has only been slightly sketched, but it is obvious that many elements from many quarters enter into the sum of his myths and rites.110 if apollo was originally the sun-god, it is certain that his influence on human life and society was as wide and beneficent as that of the sun itself. he presides over health and medicine, and over purity of body and soul. he is the god of song, and the hexameter, which first resounded in his temples, uttered its latest word in the melancholy music of the last oracle from delphi:—

say to the king that the beautiful fane hath fallen asunder,

phoebus no more hath a sheltering roof nor a sacred cell,

and the holy laurels are broken and wasted, and hushed is the wonder

of water that spake as it flowed from the deeps of the delphian well.

in his oracle he appears as the counsellor of men, between men and zeus he is a kind of mediator (like the son of baiame in australia, or of puluga in the andaman isles), tempering the austerity of justice with a yearning and kind compassion. he sanctifies the pastoral life by his example, and, as one who had known bondage to a mortal, his sympathy lightens the burden of the slave. he is the guide of colonists, he knows all the paths of earth and all the ways of the sea, and leads wanderers far from greece into secure havens, and settles them on fertile shores. but he is also the god before whom the athenians first flogged and then burned their human scapegoats.111 his example consecrated the abnormal post-homeric vices of greece. he is capable of metamorphosis into various beasts, and his temple courts are thronged with images of frogs, and mice, and wolves, and dogs, and ravens, over whose elder worship he throws his protection. he is the god of sudden death; he is amorous and revengeful. the fair humanities of old religion boast no figure more beautiful; yet he, too, bears the birthmarks of ancient creeds, and there is a shadow that stains his legend and darkens the radiance of his glory.