three more inns were situated beside the road between this point and blandford in the old days. of them, two, the ‘thorney down inn,’ and the ‘thickthorn inn’ (romantic and shuddery names!), have disappeared, while the remaining one,—the ‘cashmoor inn’—formerly situated between the other two, ekes out a much less important existence than of old, as a wayside ‘public.’
then comes a village—the first one since coombe bissett was passed, fifteen miles behind, and so more than usually welcome. a pretty village, too, tarrant hinton by name, lying in a hollow, with its little{243}
cranborne chase
image unavailable: tarrant hinton.
tarrant hinton.
{244}
{245}
street of cottages, along a road running at right angles to the exeter highway, with its church tower peeping above the orchards and thick coppices, and a sparkling stream flowing down from the hillside. in this and other respects, it bears a striking similarity to middle and over wallop.
the quiet, not to say sleepy, dorsetshire villager who, lounging at the bend of the road, replies to your query by saying that this is ‘tarnt hinton,’ is the peaceable descendant of very desperate and bloody-minded men, and the like circumstances that, a mere hundred years ago, rendered them savages, would do the same by him, were they revived. the peasantry are what the law and social conditions make them. oppress the sturdy rustic and you render him a brutal and resentful rebel, who, having an unbroken spirit, will give trouble. treat him fairly, and he will live a life of quiet industry, tempered by gossipy evenings in the village ‘pub.’; and although he will never rise to be the mincing strephon imagined by the eighteenth-century poets of rurality, he will raise gigantic potatoes, and cultivate flowers for the local horticultural society, and do nothing more tragical in all his life than the sticking of the domestic porker, or the twisting of a fowl’s neck.
the civilising of the rustic in these parts dates from the disfranchising of cranborne chase in 1830. the chase, which took its name from the town of cranborne, eight miles distant from this spot, was originally a vast deer-forest, extending far into hants, wilts, and dorset. the great western highway entered it at salisbury and did not pass out of its bounds{246} until blandford was reached; while shaftesbury to the north, and wimborne to the south, marked its extent in another direction. belonging anciently to great feudal lords or to the sovereign, it was crown property from the time of edward the fourth to the reign of james the first. james delighted in killing the buck here, but that royal prig granted the chase to the earl of pembroke, from whom, shorn of its oppressive laws, it has descended to lord rivers; while the earl of shaftesbury also owns great tracts of woodlands here. but, singularly enough, that part of the chase which still retains the wildest and densest aspect lies quite away from cranborne, and in the county of wilts, around tollard royal. the nature of the country and the character of the soil must needs always keep this vast tract wild, and, in an agricultural sense, unproductive. game will always abound here in the thickets, and indeed the weird-looking hill-top plantations, called by the rustics ‘hats of trees,’ are especially planted as cover, wherever the country is open and unsheltered.
deer-stealers
the severity of the laws which governed a chase and punished deer-stealers was simply barbarous. cranborne had its courts and chase prison where offenders and deer-stealers were punished by mutilation, imprisonment, or fine, according to the crime, the status of the offender, or the comparative state of civilisation of the period in which the offence was committed. but whether the punishment for stealing deer was the striking off of a hand, or imprisonment in a noisome dungeon, or merely being mulcted in a larger or smaller sum, there were always those who{247} unlawfully killed the buck in these romantic glades. sometimes, for the devilment of it, the dashing young blades of the countryside—sons of the squires and others—would hunt the deer.
‘from four to twenty assembled in the evening, dressed in cap and jack and quarter-staff, with dogs and nets. having set the watchword for the night and agreed whether they should stand or run if they should meet the keepers, they proceeded to the chase, set their nets, and let slip their dogs to drive the deer into the nets; a man standing at each net, to strangle the deer as soon as they were entangled. frequent desperate and bloody battles took place; the keepers, and sometimes the hunters, were killed.’
other law-breakers were of a humbler stamp, and ferocious enough to murder keepers at sight. thus, in 1738, a keeper named tollerfield was murdered on his way home from fontmell church; and another at fernditch, near ‘woodyates inn.’ for the latter crime a man named wheeler was convicted, and suffered the extreme penalty of the law; his body being hanged in chains at the scene of the murder. his friends, however, in the course of a few nights cut the body down, and threw it into a very deep well, some distance away. the weight of the irons caused it to sink, and it was not discovered until long afterwards.
one of the most exciting of these encounters between the deer-stealers and the keepers took place on the night of 16th december 1781. chettle common, away at the back of the ‘cashmoor inn,’ was the scene of this battle. the stealers, assembling in disguise at{248} pimperne, marched up the road through the night, and headed by a sergeant of dragoons, then quartered at blandford, poured through the thickthorn toll-gate, armed with weapons called ‘swindgels,’ which appear to have been hinged cudgels, like flails. it would seem that the object of this expedition was the bludgeoning of a few keepers, rather than the stealing of deer. at any rate, the keepers expected them, and armed with sticks and hangers, awaited the attack. the fight was by no means a contemptible one, for in the result one keeper was killed and several disabled, while the stealers were so badly knocked about that the whole expedition surrendered, together with the sergeant of dragoons, who had a hand sliced off at the wrist by a hanger. the hand was subsequently buried, with military honours, in pimperne churchyard.
leader and followers alike were committed to dorchester gaol, and were eventually sentenced to seven years’ penal servitude, reduced to a nominal term, in consideration of the severe wounds from which they were suffering. one wonders how far mercy, and to what extent the wish not to be at the expense of medically attending the prisoners, influenced this decision. as for the dr. jameson of this raid, he retired from the dragoons on half-pay, and, coming to london, set up shop as a dealer in game and poultry!
wiltshire moonrakers
ten years later, a keeper killed a stealer, and another murderous encounter took place on 7th december 1816 near tarrant gunville, at a gate in the woods which the melodramatic instincts of the{249} peasantry have named ‘bloody shard,’ while the wood itself is known as ‘blood-way coppice.’
cranborne chase was also at this time a haunt of smugglers, who found its tangled recesses highly convenient for storing their ‘free trade’ merchandise on its way up from the sea-coast. whether or not the original ‘wiltshire moonrakers’ belonged to the wilts portion of the chase or to some other part of the county, tradition does not say.
that wiltshire folk are called ‘moonrakers’ is generally known, and it is usually supposed that they obtained this name for stupidity, according to the story which tells how a party of travellers crossing a bridge in this county observed a number of rustics raking in the stream in which the great yellow harvest-moon was shining. asked what they were doing, the reply was that they were trying to rake ‘that cheese’ out of the water. the travellers went on their way, laughing at the idiotcy of the yokels. one tale, however, only holds good until the other is told. the facts seem to be that the rustics were smugglers who were raking in the river for the brandy-kegs they had deposited there in the gray of the morning, and that the ‘travellers’ were really revenue-officers; those ‘gaugers,’ or ‘preventive men’ who were employed to check the smuggling which was rife a hundred years ago. it may be thought that the seaside was the only place where smuggling could be carried on, but a moment’s reflection will show that the goods had to be conveyed inshore for inland customers. smuggling, in fact, was so extensive, and brought to such a perfection of{250} system that forwarding agents were established everywhere. kegs of spirits, being bulky, were hidden for the day in ponds and watercourses, wherever possible, and removed at night for another stage towards their destination, being deposited in a similar hiding-place at the break of day, and so forth until they reached their consignees. thus the ‘moonrakers’ by this explanation are acquitted of being monumental simpletons, at the expense of losing their reputation in another way. but everyone smuggled, or received or purchased smuggled goods, in those times, and no one was thought the worse for it.
