there are three kinds of constitution, and an equal number of deviation-forms — perversions, as it were, of them. the constitutions are monarchy, aristocracy, and thirdly that which is based on a property qualification, which it seems appropriate to call timocratic, though most people are wont to call it polity. the best of these is monarchy, the worst timocracy. the deviation from monarchy is tyrany; for both are forms of one-man rule, but there is the greatest difference between them; the tyrant looks to his own advantage, the king to that of his subjects. for a man is not a king unless he is sufficient to himself and excels his subjects in all good things; and such a man needs nothing further; therefore he will not look to his own interests but to those of his subjects; for a king who is not like that would be a mere titular king. now tyranny is the very contrary of this; the tyrant pursues his own good. and it is clearer in the case of tyranny that it is the worst deviation-form; but it is the contrary of the best that is worst. monarchy passes over into tyranny; for tyranny is the evil form of one-man rule and the bad king becomes a tyrant. aristocracy passes over into oligarchy by the badness of the rulers, who distribute contrary to equity what belongs to the city-all or most of the good things to themselves, and office always to the same people, paying most regard to wealth; thus the rulers are few and are bad men instead of the most worthy. timocracy passes over into democracy; for these are coterminous, since it is the ideal even of timocracy to be the rule of the majority, and all who have the property qualification count as equal. democracy is the least bad of the deviations; for in its case the form of constitution is but a slight deviation. these then are the changes to which constitutions are most subject; for these are the smallest and easiest transitions.
one may find resemblances to the constitutions and, as it were, patterns of them even in households. for the association of a father with his sons bears the form of monarchy, since the father cares for his children; and this is why homer calls zeus ‘father’; it is the ideal of monarchy to be paternal rule. but among the persians the rule of the father is tyrannical; they use their sons as slaves. tyrannical too is the rule of a master over slaves; for it is the advantage of the master that is brought about in it. now this seems to be a correct form of government, but the persian type is perverted; for the modes of rule appropriate to different relations are diverse. the association of man and wife seems to be aristocratic; for the man rules in accordance with his worth, and in those matters in which a man should rule, but the matters that befit a woman he hands over to her. if the man rules in everything the relation passes over into oligarchy; for in doing so he is not acting in accordance with their respective worth, and not ruling in virtue of his superiority. sometimes, however, women rule, because they are heiresses; so their rule is not in virtue of excellence but due to wealth and power, as in oligarchies. the association of brothers is like timocracy; for they are equal, except in so far as they differ in age; hence if they differ much in age, the friendship is no longer of the fraternal type. democracy is found chiefly in masterless dwellings (for here every one is on an equality), and in those in which the ruler is weak and every one has licence to do as he pleases.
