vi
when poirot returned to his flat he was surprised to find an unexpected visitor waiting for him.
a bald head was visible above the back of a chair, and the small neat figure of mr. barnes rose
to his feet.
with eyes that twinkled as usual, he made a dry little apology.
he had come, he explained, to return m. hercule poirot’s visit.
poirot professed himself delighted to see mr. barnes.
george was instructed to bring some coffee unless his visitor preferred tea or whisky and soda?
“coffee will be admirable,” said mr. barnes. “i imagine that your manservant prepares it well.
most english servants do not.”
presently, after a few interchanges of polite remarks, mr. barnes gave a little cough and said:
“i will be frank with you, m. poirot. it was sheer curiosity that brought me here. you, i
imagined, would be well posted in all the details of this rather curious case. i see by the papers that
the missing miss sainsbury seale has been found. that an inquest was held and adjourned for
further evidence. cause of death was stated to have been an overdose of medinal.”
“that is quite correct,” said poirot.
there was a pause and then poirot asked:
“have you ever heard of albert chapman, mr. barnes?”
“ah, the husband of the lady in whose flat miss sainsbury seale came to die? rather an elusive
person, it would seem.”
“but hardly nonexistent?”
“oh no,” said mr. barnes. “he exists. oh yes, he exists—or did exist. i had heard he was dead.
but you can’t trust these rumours.”
“who was he, mr. barnes?”
“i don’t suppose they’ll say at the inquest. not if they can help it. they’ll trot out the armaments
firm traveller story.”
“he was in the secret service then?”
“of course he was. but he had no business to tell his wife so—no business at all. in fact he
ought not to have continued in the service after his marriage. it isn’t usually done—not, that is,
when you’re one of the really hush-hush people.”
“and albert chapman was?”
“yes. q.x.912. that’s what he was known as. using a name is most irregular. oh, i don’t mean
that q.x.912 was specially important—or anything of that kind. but he was useful because he was
an insignificant kind of chap—the kind whose face isn’t easily remembered. he was used a lot as a
messenger up and down europe. you know the sort of thing. one dignified letter sent via our
ambassador in ruritania—one unofficial ditto containing the dirt per q.x.912—that is to say: mr.
albert chapman.”
“then he knew a lot of useful information?”
“probably didn’t know a thing,” said mr. barnes cheerfully. “his job was just hopping in and
out of trains and boats and aero-planes and having the right story to explain why he was going
where he was going!”
“and you heard he was dead?”
“that’s what i heard,” said mr. barnes. “but you can’t believe all you hear. i never do.”
looking at mr. barnes intently, poirot asked:
“what do you think has happened to his wife?”
“i can’t imagine,” said mr. barnes. he looked, wide-eyed at poirot. “can you?”
poirot said:
“i had an idea—” he stopped.
he said slowly:
“it is very confusing.”
mr. barnes murmured sympathetically: “anything worrying you in particular?”
hercule poirot said slowly:
“yes. the evidence of my own eyes….”
